vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White leads on support and fit.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers advanced support and technology, while the Brooks Women's Anthem 7 is a more affordable option for beginners. Choose based on your budget and running needs.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better

Price

ASICS is more advanced but pricier.

Technology

ASICS features 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM.

Comfort

ASICS provides targeted support.

Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Affordability

Brooks is significantly cheaper.

Popularity

Brooks has a better sales rank.

Lightweight

Brooks emphasizes lightweight design.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White
85
Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/WhiteBrooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Kayano 32Anthem 7
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshAir Mesh
CushioningFF BLAST™ PLUSDNA Midsole
Support4D GUIDANCESegmented Crash Pad

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/WhiteBrooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes are priced at $154.45, making them significantly more expensive than the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7, which costs $84.93. This means the ASICS shoes are about 82% more expensive than the Brooks option. If budget is a primary concern for you, the Brooks Anthem 7 offers a more economical choice without sacrificing quality.

Design and Aesthetics

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 features a striking black and white design that is both modern and versatile, suitable for various running environments. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 showcases a white, black, and tan color palette that appeals to those who prefer a more classic look. Both shoes emphasize aesthetics, but your choice may depend on personal style preferences—whether you lean towards the contemporary look of the ASICS or the timeless appeal of the Brooks.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is designed with several advanced features, including a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and Rearfoot PureGEL technology, aimed at providing adaptive stability and cushioning. The shoe's engineered mesh upper also enhances breathability, which is critical for longer runs. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 focuses on comfort with its lightweight DNA midsole cushioning and breathable air mesh upper. While both shoes offer excellent comfort, the ASICS may provide slightly more targeted support for those who require it.

Technology and Performance Features

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 incorporates advanced technologies like the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION, which help adapt to different foot strikes and provide stability under load. This makes it a great option for serious runners looking for performance enhancements. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 features a Segmented Crash Pad that optimizes transitions and enhances efficiency. While both shoes leverage technology for performance, the ASICS model may be better suited for runners who prioritize structured support.

Breathability

Breathability is vital for runners, especially during warmer months. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 includes a lightweight, breathable mesh material that reduces the need for additional overlays, keeping feet cool. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 also offers a breathable upper designed for comfort and flexibility, ensuring a snug fit without overheating. Although both shoes excel in this category, the ASICS may have a slight edge due to its specialized material aimed at enhancing airflow.

Weight and Portability

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is designed with a higher midsole stack height but remains lightweight, making it a solid choice for distance runners. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7, marketed as a great introduction to performance running, also emphasizes a lightweight build, contributing to a smooth running experience. While specific weights are not provided, both shoes prioritize portability and comfort, making them suitable for running enthusiasts who value ease of movement.

Sales Rank and Popularity

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 has a sales rank of 3805, while the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 has a slightly better rank at 3377. This indicates that the Brooks model is currently more popular among consumers, suggesting that it may offer greater perceived value or appeal. If you often look to bestseller rankings to inform your choices, the Brooks Anthem 7 might be the safer bet based on its higher rank.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 ultimately depends on your individual needs as a runner. If you are seeking advanced support and are willing to invest more, the ASICS may be the right fit. However, if you prioritize affordability and are looking for a solid introductory performance running shoe, the Brooks Anthem 7 stands out as a commendable choice. Both options have unique strengths, but your final decision should align with your specific running style and budget.