vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White wins on comfort and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running wins on weight and breathability.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior comfort and support for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a budget-friendly, versatile option for casual use.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better

Comfort

Advanced support technology in ASICS.

Support

4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM enhances stability.

Brand Reputation

ASICS is known for high-performance running shoes.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better

Price

New Balance is significantly cheaper.

Weight

New Balance is lighter at just over 200 grams.

Versatility

New Balance suitable for casual wear.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
70

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
CushioningFF BLAST™ PLUSFresh Foam
OutsoleDurable rubberDurable rubber
UpperEngineered meshBreathable mesh
Sales Rank38053173
WeightNot specifiedJust over 200 grams

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes are priced at $154.45, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $59.99. This makes the New Balance shoe about 61% less expensive than the ASICS model. If budget is a primary concern, the New Balance option presents a much more affordable choice, allowing for considerable savings without sacrificing essential features for running.

Comfort and Support

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels with its advanced features. It incorporates the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which provides adaptive stability and comfort for runners, while the FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole ensures a smoother and more balanced running experience. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers fresh foam cushioning that delivers responsive comfort, but it does not include the same level of specialized support technology found in the ASICS model. For runners prioritizing extensive comfort and support, the ASICS shoe is superior.

Weight and Design

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 boasts a lightweight design of just over 200 grams, which is beneficial for those looking to minimize fatigue during their runs. On the other hand, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 does not specify its weight, it is generally considered to be a bit more substantial due to its supportive features. If you are looking for a shoe that feels light on your feet, the New Balance might be the better option, whereas the ASICS may appeal to those who prefer a more robust shoe.

Breathability

Breathability is a crucial factor for running shoes, and both models feature mesh uppers designed to keep your feet cool and comfortable. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 utilizes an engineered mesh upper that reduces the need for additional overlays, enhancing airflow. Similarly, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 includes breathable mesh material that keeps feet dry during workouts. While both shoes excel in this category, the emphasis on an engineered design in the ASICS model may offer slightly better ventilation for longer runs.

Traction and Durability

In terms of traction and durability, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 features a durable rubber outsole designed for reliable traction across various running surfaces. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 also emphasizes durability with its construction but does not specify the outsole material. For those who often run on diverse terrains, the New Balance shoe may provide a more reliable grip, which is crucial for safety and performance.

Usage Versatility

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is designed for multiple uses, making it suitable not just for running but also for casual errands. Its lightweight nature and breathable mesh make it a versatile option for everyday wear. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is specifically tailored for serious runners, focusing on providing maximum support and comfort during extensive training sessions. If you seek a shoe that performs well in various settings, the New Balance may be the better choice, while the ASICS is ideal for dedicated runners.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

Both brands hold a strong reputation in the athletic footwear market. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 has a bestseller rank of 3805, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 ranks slightly higher at 3173. This indicates that the New Balance model is more popular among consumers, potentially reflecting its appeal to a broader audience. A higher sales rank can often signify customer satisfaction and reliability, which might influence your purchasing decision.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 boils down to your specific needs and budget. If you are a serious runner who prioritizes comfort, support, and advanced technology, the ASICS model is worth the investment at $154.45. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers comfort and versatility for casual use, the New Balance at $59.99 is an excellent choice. Ultimately, your decision will depend on whether you value advanced features and support over cost and lightweight design.