ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White wins on support and comfort, Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova wins on weight.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 excels in advanced running technology and support, while the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour offers superior comfort and affordability.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Performance
Advanced running technology for serious runners
Support
Enhanced stability features for long-distance running
Durability
Built for long-distance running with high-quality materials
Why Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova is better
Price
Significantly lower price point
Comfort
Exceptional cushioning for casual wear
Maintenance
Machine washable for easy care
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Skechers |
| Model | Gel-Kayano 32 | Max Cushioning Endeavour |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Insole | FF BLAST™ PLUS | Air-Cooled Goga Mat |
| Midsole | 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM | ULTRA LIGHT |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is priced at $154.45, while the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour is significantly cheaper at $67.74, making it about 56% less expensive. This substantial price difference indicates that both shoes cater to different market segments and preferences. While the ASICS model focuses on advanced running technology and support, the Skechers shoe emphasizes comfort and simplicity, appealing to casual wearers and runners alike.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 features a sleek black and white design with a lightweight, breathable engineered mesh upper that not only looks stylish but also enhances performance by reducing the need for additional overlays. In contrast, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour showcases a vibrant blue and orange color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a more energetic aesthetic. Both shoes are designed to be visually appealing while serving their functional purposes, but ASICS leans more towards a performance-oriented look, while Skechers aims for a casual and sporty vibe.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour stands out with its Air-Cooled Goga Mat insole and Ultra Light midsole cushioning, providing exceptional comfort with every step. The Skechers model is also machine washable, adding to its convenience for everyday use. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32, on the other hand, incorporates FF BLAST™ PLUS foam and a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM feature that enhances stability and comfort during runs. While both shoes excel in comfort, the Skechers model is more user-friendly for those seeking a hassle-free experience.
Technology and Performance
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is equipped with advanced running technology, including the 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION feature that improves foot compression and softens the feel underfoot. The 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM provides adaptive stability, making it ideal for longer runs and distance training. In comparison, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour employs Natural Rocker Technology for smooth transitions, making it suitable for casual walking and light running. For serious runners, the ASICS shoe offers superior performance technology, while the Skechers shoe is designed for comfort during light activities.
Breathability and Support
Both shoes prioritize breathability, but they do so in different ways. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 utilizes a breathable mesh upper designed to keep feet cool during runs, particularly in warmer weather. The knit heel pull tab enhances the ease of putting the shoe on and taking it off, adding to its supportive features. Meanwhile, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour also features an engineered mesh upper but focuses more on providing a cushioned experience through its insole technology. While both models offer adequate support, the ASICS shoe is better equipped to handle the demands of serious runners.
Durability and Maintenance
In terms of durability, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 is built to withstand the rigors of long-distance running, thanks to its high-quality materials and advanced engineering. The Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour is also designed with durability in mind, featuring synthetic overlays that offer supportive structure. However, the Skechers shoe has the added benefit of being machine washable, which simplifies maintenance and care. Runners looking for a long-lasting shoe for serious training may lean towards the ASICS model, while casual wearers will appreciate the easy upkeep of Skechers.
Sales Rankings and Market Position
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 has a sales rank of 3,805, indicating a solid position in the competitive running shoe market. Meanwhile, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour ranks significantly higher at 989, suggesting a broader appeal and popularity among consumers. This disparity in sales rank may reflect the Skechers shoe's versatility for casual wear and light exercise, while the ASICS shoe is tailored more specifically for dedicated runners.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour largely depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you are a serious runner looking for advanced technology and superior support, the ASICS shoe is worth the investment at $154.45. However, if you prioritize comfort and versatility for casual use at a much lower price of $67.74, the Skechers model is an excellent choice. Ultimately, both shoes cater to different audiences, ensuring that there's a suitable option for everyone in the running and casual footwear market.

