Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium vs Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova Sneaker, Blue/Orange, 9 Wide

Price Comparison

The Skechers Women’s Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova Sneaker is significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe. At $67.74, it is about 38% cheaper than the $110.00 price of the Brooks Ghost 17. This price difference represents a clear cost advantage for budget-conscious buyers seeking comfort without a premium investment. The Skechers model also has a lower average price over the past 90 days ($65.25) compared to the Brooks shoe’s $135.83, reinforcing its value positioning in the market.

Cushioning Technology

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning with an extra 1mm in the heel and 3mm in the forefoot, providing lightweight softness and consistent comfort across miles. This advanced cushioning system is designed for road running and long-distance wear, delivering a responsive yet plush feel. In contrast, the Skechers Women’s Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova uses ULTRA LIGHT midsole cushioning combined with an Air-Cooled Goga Mat insole that offers high-rebound support. While both prioritize comfort, the Brooks version emphasizes durability and performance consistency over extended use, while Skechers focuses on immediate, springy responsiveness ideal for casual activity.

Support and Fit

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 includes a double jacquard air mesh upper with a kick-back collar for enhanced structure and breathability, ensuring a snug, adaptive fit that supports natural foot movement during runs or walks. Its design promotes airflow and stability, making it suitable for daily training and travel. The Skechers Women’s Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova, meanwhile, uses an engineered mesh upper with synthetic overlays for breathable support, though no specific collar or structural details are mentioned beyond the general description. The Brooks model offers a more defined fit profile, particularly beneficial for runners needing consistent foot lockdown, whereas the Skechers version appears more focused on general comfort and ease of wear.

Transition and Movement

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 incorporates precise flex grooves in its midsole to promote smooth transitions, enabling a natural toe-off and helping maintain momentum during runs. This design enhances stride efficiency and is ideal for those who value a fluid gait. The Skechers Women’s Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova features NRT – Natural Rocker Technology, which also facilitates smooth heel-to-toe transitions, reducing strain on joints. While both models aim to improve movement flow, the Brooks’ approach is more explicitly tied to performance running mechanics, whereas Skechers’ rocker system is marketed broadly for everyday comfort and reduced fatigue.

Durability and Materials

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 boasts a rubber outsole crafted with recycled silica, offering a balance of durability, lightweight performance, and responsive rebound across various terrains. This eco-conscious material choice aligns with the shoe’s carbon-neutral certification. The Skechers Women’s Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova does not specify outsole composition but notes that the entire shoe is machine washable and air-dry friendly—a practical feature for easy maintenance. While neither product discloses full material breakdowns, the Brooks shoe provides more transparency around sustainability and long-term wear performance, particularly relevant for frequent users.

Special Features and Certifications

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 stands out with multiple certifications: it is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and carries the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating clinical validation for foot health and comfort. It is also officially labeled as a carbon-neutral product, reflecting environmental commitment. The Skechers Women’s Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova is described as vegan-friendly and includes a breathable insole with high-rebound properties, but no third-party medical or environmental certifications are listed. These distinctions make the Brooks model a stronger choice for individuals with specific foot health needs or sustainability priorities.

Which should you buy?

If you’re seeking a high-performance, medically endorsed running shoe with superior cushioning longevity and eco-friendly credentials, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe at $110.00 is the better choice—especially given its bestseller rank of 61, reflecting strong consumer trust. However, if your priority is affordability and everyday comfort without sacrificing core cushioning, the Skechers Women’s Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova Sneaker at $67.74 offers compelling value. It is nearly 40% cheaper and still delivers responsive cushioning and smooth transitions. For casual walkers, gym-goers, or those on a tight budget, the Skechers model is the smarter pick. But for dedicated runners or those requiring diabetic-safe, clinically validated footwear, the Brooks Ghost 17 justifies its higher price.