vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and sales rank, ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on price and stability.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in cushioning and eco-friendliness, while the GT-2000 13 offers stability at a lower price. Choose based on your running needs.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

Gel-Nimbus 27 provides superior cushioning with PureGEL technology.

Eco-Friendliness

Gel-Nimbus 27 has 75% recycled content in the upper.

Sales Rank

Gel-Nimbus 27 has a better sales rank at 2393.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Price

GT-2000 13 is $25 cheaper.

Stability

GT-2000 13 features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better stability.

Weight

GT-2000 13 is lighter due to its design.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
Price$124.95$99.95
Upper Material75% recycled50% recycled
Cushioning TechPureGELRearfoot PureGEL
Sales Rank23939491
Support SystemNone3D GUIDANCE

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White

Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and GT-2000 13

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is priced at $124.95, while the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is about 17% cheaper at $99.95. Both shoes are designed for runners, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. The Gel-Nimbus 27 focuses on plush cushioning and eco-friendly materials, whereas the GT-2000 13 emphasizes stability and support. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right shoe for your running style and budget.

Design and Aesthetics

The Gel-Nimbus 27 features a sleek and modern design with a black and lake grey color scheme, while the GT-2000 13 showcases a classic black and white look. The Gel-Nimbus 27 is crafted with an engineered jacquard mesh upper that wraps the foot for a soft feel, making it visually appealing and comfortable. In contrast, the GT-2000 13 employs a jacquard mesh upper that provides a supportive fit. Both designs prioritize comfort, but the Gel-Nimbus 27 offers a more premium look with its innovative upper material.

Comfort and Fit

When it comes to comfort, the Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out with its PureGEL technology, which ensures lightweight cushioning and softer landings. This model is designed for runners who prioritize plush support during their runs. The GT-2000 13, while also comfortable, includes a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that enhances stability, making it suitable for runners who may need extra support. Both models boast a sockliner produced with a solution dyeing process that reduces water usage, but the Gel-Nimbus 27’s emphasis on cushioning may provide a slight edge in comfort.

Performance and Stability

The performance of the GT-2000 13 is enhanced by its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, providing advanced stability for a smoother stride. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who overpronate or require additional support. On the other hand, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is engineered for a soft ride, making it ideal for those who favor a cushioned experience. While both shoes utilize PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning, the GT-2000 13’s stability focus makes it a better choice for long-distance runners seeking a controlled stride.

Eco-Friendliness

Both models incorporate eco-friendly materials, but the Gel-Nimbus 27 takes the lead with at least 75% of its upper material made from recycled content. This commitment to sustainability is complemented by a lower carbon footprint due to its innovative manufacturing processes. The GT-2000 13 features at least 50% recycled content in its upper, which is still commendable but trails behind the Gel-Nimbus 27. For environmentally conscious runners, the Gel-Nimbus 27 not only offers superior performance but also aligns closely with eco-friendly values.

Price Comparison

With a price tag of $124.95, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is positioned as a premium running shoe, while the GT-2000 13’s price of $99.95 makes it an appealing option for budget-conscious consumers. The $25 difference may seem minimal, but it represents about a 17% reduction in cost for the GT-2000 13. For runners who want quality without the premium price, the GT-2000 13 provides a solid balance of performance, comfort, and price.

Sales and Popularity

In terms of sales rank, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is currently ranked 2393, while the GT-2000 13 holds a rank of 9491. The better sales rank of the Gel-Nimbus 27 suggests that it is a more popular choice among consumers, possibly due to its cushioned comfort and eco-friendly features. However, the GT-2000 13 still appeals to a significant number of runners, especially those seeking stability and affordability.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the GT-2000 13 ultimately depends on your running style and preferences. If you prioritize plush cushioning and eco-friendliness, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is worth the investment at $124.95. However, if you are looking for a supportive and stable shoe at a lower price point, the GT-2000 13 offers great value at $99.95. Consider your specific needs as a runner to make the best choice for your next run.