vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on sustainability and price, Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide wins on comfort and design.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers a more budget-friendly and eco-conscious option, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels in comfort and style.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS is $35 cheaper than Brooks.

Sustainability

ASICS uses 75% recycled materials.

Cushioning

ASICS features eco-friendly cushioning technology.

Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better

Comfort

Brooks has nitrogen-infused cushioning.

Fit

Brooks accommodates orthotics for better fit.

Design

Brooks offers a more vibrant color scheme.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Nimbus 27Ghost Max 3
Price$124.95$159.95
CushioningPureGELDNA LOFT V3
Upper MaterialRecycled MeshNylon

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is priced at $124.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, which costs $159.95. When considering running shoes, price can play a significant role in decision-making, especially for budget-conscious buyers. ASICS offers a more economical choice without compromising on quality. In contrast, Brooks targets those willing to invest a bit more for enhanced features and style. Choosing the right shoe often comes down to evaluating what benefits justify the higher price.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 showcases a sleek engineered jacquard mesh upper, providing a modern and sporty look. The black and lake grey color scheme appeals to those who prefer understated elegance. On the other hand, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 exhibits a sleek sporty style with its black, black, and rose gold color palette. This design offers a more vibrant aesthetic that might attract those looking for a pop of color in their footwear. Both shoes feature a low-top design, but the distinct visual appeal can sway buyers depending on personal taste.

Comfort Features

Comfort is a critical aspect of running shoes, and both the ASICS and Brooks models excel. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates PureGEL technology, providing lightweight cushioning and softer landings, which is essential for long-distance runners. It also boasts FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning made with 24% bio-based content, ensuring a responsive toe-off. Conversely, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 features a nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning system that promises enhanced comfort and support. Both shoes are designed for comfort, but ASICS emphasizes eco-friendliness while Brooks focuses on luxurious cushioning and fit.

Fit and Sizing

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is available in size 8.5, and its construction is intended to wrap the foot snugly, providing a soft feel. The shoe's design prioritizes a secure fit, which is vital for runners. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is also available in size 8.5 but is noted for its inclusive fit that accommodates orthotics, making it a suitable choice for those with specific foot needs. The difference in fit could be a deciding factor for runners who prioritize comfort and stability during their runs.

Material and Sustainability

When it comes to materials, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out for its commitment to sustainability. At least 75% of its main upper material is made with recycled content, which significantly reduces waste and carbon emissions. This eco-conscious approach is appealing to environmentally aware consumers. Conversely, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 does not highlight any sustainable materials in its construction, focusing instead on performance and comfort features. For buyers concerned about the environmental impact of their choices, ASICS presents a more responsible option.

Performance and Technology

Performance-wise, both shoes are engineered for runners, but they utilize different technologies. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, designed for lightweight responsiveness and comfort. With a sales rank of 2393, it demonstrates a solid presence in the market. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, with a sales rank of 2293, is equipped with nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning, offering a plush feel and support during runs. While both shoes perform well, the specific technologies used may cater to different running styles and preferences.

Weight and Agility

Weight can significantly affect a runner’s performance. While specific weights for both shoes are not provided, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 emphasizes a lightweight design with its PureGEL technology aimed at providing softer landings. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is crafted to add more volume for a more inclusive fit, which could potentially add some weight but enhances comfort and support. Runners seeking a lighter shoe might gravitate towards ASICS, while those who prioritize fit and comfort may prefer Brooks.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 ultimately depends on your priorities as a runner. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option with environmentally friendly materials and solid performance, the ASICS is an excellent choice. However, if you're willing to invest a bit more for added comfort and a stylish design, the Brooks may be the better option. Each shoe has its unique strengths, making your individual needs the deciding factor in this comparison.