ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on comfort and cushioning, Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on style and weight.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers advanced cushioning and sustainability, while the Brooks Women's Revel 7 provides great versatility at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features advanced PureGEL technology.
Sustainability
ASICS uses 75% recycled materials.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better bestseller rank.
Why Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is $50 cheaper.
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities.
Comfort
Brooks offers adaptable cushioning.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 27 | Revel 7 |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Knit |
| Cushioning Tech | PureGEL | DNA |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe is available for $74.95. This makes the Brooks shoe about 40% cheaper than the ASICS option. If budget is a significant factor in your decision, the Brooks model offers substantial savings without compromising on performance. The ASICS model, while more expensive, boasts advanced technology and materials that may justify the higher price for serious runners.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of both running shoes caters to different tastes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features an engineered jacquard mesh upper that provides a soft feel, complemented by a sleek Black and Lake Grey color scheme. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 showcases a more casual yet sporty look with its Oyster Mushroom and Primer Gray combination. The ASICS design emphasizes a performance-oriented aesthetic, while the Brooks shoe leans towards a versatile style suitable for various casual settings. Both designs aim to deliver comfort and breathability, but the choice ultimately depends on personal style preferences.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is a crucial aspect of any running shoe, and both models excel in this area. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 employs PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning and soft landings, making it a great option for long-distance runners. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 features adaptable DNA midsole cushioning that adjusts to your stride, weight, and speed, providing a versatile and responsive feel. While the ASICS shoe may be better suited for those prioritizing cushioning, the Brooks model offers a balance of comfort and adaptability, catering to a wider range of activities.
Performance Features
In terms of performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates advanced technologies such as FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, which is made with approximately 24% bio-based content. This technology not only enhances performance but also aims to reduce environmental impact. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 focuses on energy return and impact deflection through its adaptable cushioning, making it suitable for various running styles. While both shoes offer unique performance benefits, the ASICS model leans more towards eco-friendly innovations, whereas the Brooks shoe emphasizes versatility in performance across different activities.
Sustainability
Sustainability is a key consideration for many consumers today, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out with its commitment to reducing environmental impact. At least 75% of the shoe’s main upper material is made with recycled content, and the solution dyeing process used for the sockliner significantly reduces water usage and carbon emissions. The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 does not specifically highlight its sustainability efforts, making the ASICS model a more appealing choice for environmentally-conscious shoppers. If sustainability is a priority for you, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is a clear winner.
Versatility
Versatility is another important factor when choosing running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 is designed as a springy performance shoe suitable for workouts and casual settings alike, making it ideal for runners who engage in various activities. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is primarily targeted at serious runners looking for maximum cushioning and support. While both shoes perform well, the Brooks model offers a more adaptable use case, appealing to those who want a shoe that can transition from running to everyday wear.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Brand reputation plays a role in consumer decisions, and both ASICS and Brooks are well-regarded in the running community. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 has a bestseller rank of 2393, while the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 has a slightly lower rank at 19777. This indicates that the ASICS model is currently more popular among consumers. However, it's essential to consider that sales rank can fluctuate based on various factors, including promotions and new releases. Both brands have a loyal following, but the ASICS model's higher rank suggests stronger current consumer interest.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize advanced cushioning technologies, sustainability, and are willing to invest more, the ASICS model is a strong contender. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option that offers great versatility and comfort for a variety of activities, the Brooks shoe is a compelling choice. Both shoes have their strengths, so consider your running style, budget, and aesthetic preferences before making a decision.

