ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and comfort, Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium wins on weight.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in sustainability and cushioning, while the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 offers a lightweight design at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Sustainability
75% recycled materials in upper
Cushioning
PureGEL technology for softer landings
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank at 2393
Why Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium is better
Price
Lower price at $122.49
Weight
Lightweight design for long-distance
Fit
More foot-hugging fit
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | HOKA |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 27 | Rincon 4 |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Textile |
| Cushion Type | PureGEL | Upgraded Foam |
| Size Available | 8.5 | 9 Medium |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes retail at $124.95, while the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 is priced slightly lower at $122.49, making it about 1.2% cheaper. This price difference of $2.46 may seem minimal, but for budget-conscious shoppers, even a small saving can influence their decision. Both brands are well-regarded in the running community, so the choice could come down to personal preference regarding design and features, alongside this slight cost advantage.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers a sleek look with its black and lake grey color scheme. The engineered jacquard mesh upper gives it a modern touch while providing a soft feel. In contrast, the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 features an all-black design that appeals to those who prefer a classic, understated aesthetic. While the Rincon 4 emphasizes a minimalist approach, the Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out with its dynamic color blending. Ultimately, style preference will vary among users, but both shoes are designed to appeal to different tastes.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is paramount for running shoes, and both models excel in this area, albeit through different technologies. The Gel-Nimbus 27 utilizes PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning, ensuring a softer landing. Additionally, the FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning offers a responsive toe-off, creating an enjoyable running experience. On the other hand, the Rincon 4 boasts a renowned cushion-to-weight ratio that enhances comfort on longer runs. It features upgraded foam for better rebound and a two-layer midsole that works in tandem with a rubberized EVA outsole. Both shoes provide exceptional comfort, but the experience may differ based on individual preferences for cushioning types.
Sustainability Features
Sustainability is an important factor for many consumers, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 makes significant strides in this area. About 75% of the shoe's main upper material is made from recycled content, reducing waste and carbon emissions. Furthermore, the sockliner is produced using a solution dyeing process that cuts water usage by roughly 33% and lowers carbon emissions by about 45%. In contrast, the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 does not highlight any specific sustainable materials or processes in its description. For environmentally conscious buyers, the Gel-Nimbus 27 may be the preferred choice due to its commitment to sustainability.
Fit and Sizing
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is available in size 8.5, while the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 comes in size 9 medium. Both shoes are designed to provide a comfortable fit, but the specific sizing may affect the overall experience for users with different foot shapes. The Gel-Nimbus 27 features a soft upper that wraps around the foot, potentially offering a more snug fit, whereas the Rincon 4 is designed for a more foot-hugging fit due to its padded tongue and engineered double jacquard upper. The choice between them may depend on individual foot shape and preferred snugness.
Performance and Durability
In terms of performance, the Gel-Nimbus 27 has a sales rank of 2393, indicating it is a popular choice among runners. This model is engineered for long-distance comfort, thanks to its advanced cushioning technologies. The Rincon 4, however, ranks lower at 17234, which might suggest it is less favored in the market. Despite this, the Rincon 4 is built for longevity with its durable podular outsole design and rubberized EVA, making it suitable for daily training. The Gel-Nimbus 27 may have an edge in sales popularity, but the Rincon 4's construction suggests it is also built to withstand the test of time.
Brand Reputation
Both ASICS and Hoka have strong reputations in the running shoe market. ASICS is known for its emphasis on performance and comfort, with a loyal following among serious runners. The Gel-Nimbus series, in particular, is often praised for its cushioning and support. Hoka, on the other hand, has carved out a niche with its maximum cushioning and lightweight designs, appealing to those who prioritize comfort over weight. While both brands are respected, the choice will ultimately hinge on individual experiences and brand loyalty.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific needs. The Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in sustainability, advanced cushioning, and has a stronger sales rank, making it a solid choice for environmentally-conscious runners looking for comfort. Meanwhile, the Rincon 4 offers a slightly lower price and a lightweight design that emphasizes long-distance performance. If you value eco-friendly materials and a cushioned ride, the Gel-Nimbus 27 may be the way to go. However, if you prefer a lightweight shoe with a classic look, the Rincon 4 is an excellent option.

