ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on eco-friendliness and cushioning, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running wins on weight.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers superior cushioning and sustainability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is more affordable and lightweight.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features advanced PureGEL technology for better cushioning.
Sustainability
ASICS uses at least 75% recycled materials.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a higher sales rank indicating popularity.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper at $59.99.
Weight
New Balance is lighter at just over 200 grams.
Breathability
New Balance has a breathable mesh design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | PureGEL technology | Fresh Foam cushioning |
| Upper Material | Recycled content | Breathable mesh |
| Weight | Not specified | Just over 200 grams |
| Outsole | Not specified | Durable rubber |
| Price | $124.95 | $59.99 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is significantly more affordable, retailing at $59.99, which is about 52% less than the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, priced at $124.95. This substantial price difference may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers or those seeking a solid entry-level running shoe. While the ASICS is positioned as a premium option with advanced features, the New Balance offers a great value for those who want reliable performance without breaking the bank.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 has a leg up with its PureGEL technology, designed to provide lightweight cushioning and softer landings. This feature may be particularly beneficial for runners who log many miles on hard surfaces. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 also prioritizes comfort with its fresh foam cushioning that promises responsive comfort. While both shoes aim to enhance comfort, the ASICS may have the edge for serious runners looking for advanced cushioning technologies.
Weight and Design
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 shines with its lightweight design, weighing just over 200 grams. This makes it a fantastic choice for runners who prioritize speed and agility. Conversely, while the weight of the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is not specified, the shoe's advanced features and technologies may suggest a slightly heavier build. Runners who prefer a lighter shoe for faster workouts may find the New Balance’s design appealing, while those looking for a more substantial feel may lean towards the ASICS.
Breathability
Breathability is another critical factor for running shoes, and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 excels in this area. Its breathable mesh construction helps keep feet cool and dry during workouts. While the ASICS also features an engineered jacquard mesh upper that wraps the foot softly, the emphasis on breathability is more pronounced in the New Balance model. Runners who tend to sweat or run in warmer conditions may find the New Balance more suitable for their needs.
Traction and Durability
When it comes to traction and durability, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers a durable rubber outsole designed to provide reliable traction on various running surfaces. This feature is particularly important for runners who often change terrains. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 does not specifically mention its outsole design, focusing instead on cushioning and comfort technologies. Therefore, for those who prioritize traction and durability, the New Balance may be the better choice.
Environmental Considerations
In terms of environmental impact, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 has a commendable focus on sustainability. At least 75% of its main upper material is made from recycled content, and its manufacturing process reduces water usage and carbon emissions significantly. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 does not highlight any specific eco-friendly features, which may be a consideration for consumers looking to support sustainable brands. If eco-friendliness is a priority, the ASICS model stands out as the more responsible choice.
Sales Rank
Looking at sales rank, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is ranked 2393, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 has a slightly lower rank at 3173. While these ranks indicate popularity, it's important to note that both shoes have their unique features that cater to different runner preferences. The higher sales rank of the ASICS may suggest a strong following among serious runners, while the New Balance's lower rank could indicate it serves a different segment of casual runners or those new to the sport.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 ultimately comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for a lightweight, affordable option with good breathability and comfort, the New Balance is a compelling choice at $59.99. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning technology, sustainability, and are willing to invest more at $124.95, the ASICS may be the better fit. Consider what features matter most to you and how much you are willing to spend, as both options offer distinct advantages.

