vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on comfort and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers superior cushioning and sustainability features, making it a better choice for serious runners, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 is a budget-friendly option for casual use.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

ASICS uses advanced PureGEL technology for better cushioning.

Sustainability

ASICS incorporates at least 75% recycled materials.

Brand Reputation

ASICS has a stronger reputation among serious runners.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better

Price

New Balance is significantly cheaper at $69.99.

Versatility

New Balance is designed for casual use and everyday wear.

Fit

New Balance features a no-sew construction for a sleek fit.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
70

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
Upper MaterialEngineered meshKnit upper
Cushioning TypePureGEL + FF BLASTFresh Foam
Bio-Based Content24%3%
DropN/A8 mm
WeightLightweightLightweight

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe comes in at a more affordable $69.99. This makes the New Balance option approximately 44% cheaper than the ASICS model. For budget-conscious shoppers, this significant price difference could be a deciding factor, especially if you are looking for a quality running shoe without a hefty investment.

Design and Aesthetics

Both the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 and New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 feature modern designs that cater to both functionality and style. The ASICS model showcases an engineered jacquard mesh upper, designed to wrap the foot comfortably and provide a soft feel. In contrast, the New Balance shoe features a precision-engineered knit upper that prioritizes comfort and ventilation. While the ASICS shoe emphasizes sustainability with at least 75% of its upper material made from recycled content, the New Balance’s no-sew construction offers a sleek fit. Each design caters to different preferences but both aim to provide an aesthetically pleasing look for runners.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to cushioning, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 utilizes PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning and softer landings. It also incorporates FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning made with approximately 24% bio-based content, enhancing the shoe's responsiveness. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 features Fresh Foam midsole cushioning that is ultra-cushioned and lightweight, with about 3% bio-based content. While both shoes aim to provide comfort, the ASICS model offers a more advanced cushioning system that might appeal to those who prioritize a softer landing.

Performance and Usage

The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is ranked 2393 in sales, indicating a solid reputation among runners. Its combination of cushioning and support makes it suitable for long-distance runs and heavier training sessions. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 has a sales rank of 13745, suggesting it is still a popular choice but may not be as preferred for high-performance running. Designed for everyday use, the New Balance shoes are ideal for casual runs, workouts, and even running errands, making them versatile but potentially less focused on performance compared to the ASICS model.

Sustainability Features

Sustainability is a notable aspect of the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27, as it features recycled materials in at least 75% of its upper construction and uses a dyeing process that significantly reduces water usage and carbon emissions. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8, while also incorporating bio-based content in its cushioning, doesn’t emphasize sustainability as strongly. If environmental impact is a priority for you, the ASICS model may hold an advantage due to its higher percentage of recycled materials and eco-friendly practices.

Fit and Sizing

The ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 is available in various sizes, including the specific size of 8.5 mentioned in its title. The shoe is designed to provide a snug yet comfortable fit, catering to runners who need support during long runs. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 also offers a range of sizes and features an 8 mm drop, which may appeal to runners looking for a specific heel-to-toe transition. However, the no-sew construction of the New Balance model may provide a more streamlined fit for those who prefer a snug, adaptable shoe.

Brand Reputation

ASICS is well-regarded in the running community, particularly for its focus on performance and comfort, as evidenced by the Gel-Nimbus series being a favorite among serious runners. With a bestseller rank of 2393, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 has proven to be a reliable choice. New Balance, while also a respected brand, ranks slightly lower with a sales rank of 13745. This difference may reflect the ASICS's stronger reputation for high-performance running shoes, which could influence a buyer's decision based on brand loyalty and performance history.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 ultimately depends on your priorities. If you're looking for advanced cushioning, sustainability, and a shoe designed for serious running, the ASICS model may be worth the higher price of $124.95. However, if budget is a significant concern, and you seek a versatile shoe for casual use, the New Balance option at $69.99 is a solid choice that doesn’t compromise on comfort. Each shoe has its strengths, so weigh the features against your specific needs and preferences before making a decision.