ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on eco-friendliness and cushioning, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX wins on style.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers superior cushioning and sustainability, while the New Balance Fresh Foam Arishi v4 is a budget-friendly option. Choose based on your running needs.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Advanced PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning
Sustainability
75% recycled upper material
Performance
Higher sales rank indicates better performance
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $68.00
Weight
Lighter design for casual runs
Style
Brighter color options
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 27 | Fresh Foam Arishi v4 |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Mesh |
| Midsole | FF BLAST PLUS ECO | Fresh Foam |
| Outsole | Rubber | Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $68.00. This makes the New Balance shoe about 46% less expensive than the ASICS model. The price difference reflects the varying features and technologies incorporated into each shoe. If budget is a primary concern, the New Balance offers a compelling option without straying too far from quality.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of aesthetics, the ASICS shoe features a sleek black and lake grey design, which gives it a modern and versatile look. The engineered jacquard mesh upper wraps the foot comfortably, enhancing both style and fit. Conversely, the New Balance shoe comes in a softer Pink Salt/Rosewood combination, appealing to those who prefer a brighter appearance. Both shoes boast a breathable upper, but the New Balance utilizes no-sew overlays for a streamlined look. Personal preference in color and design will ultimately sway potential buyers between these two options.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a crucial aspect of running shoes, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in this area. It features PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, designed for softer landings and responsive toe-offs. On the other hand, the New Balance shoe is equipped with Fresh Foam midsole cushioning that provides an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS model incorporates more advanced cushioning technologies, making it potentially more suitable for long-distance runners seeking maximum comfort.
Sustainability
Sustainability is increasingly important in footwear, and the ASICS shoe demonstrates a commitment to eco-friendliness. At least 75% of its upper material is made from recycled content, and the sockliner production reduces water and carbon emissions significantly. The New Balance shoe, while durable with its rubber outsole, does not highlight any specific sustainability features. For eco-conscious consumers, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out as the more environmentally responsible choice.
Performance
Regarding performance, the ASICS shoe's advanced technologies, like PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, are tailored for enhanced performance during runs. The ASICS model holds a sales rank of 2393, indicating its popularity among runners, which often correlates with its performance capabilities. The New Balance shoe, with its simpler design and cushioning, ranks lower at 32236. While it still offers decent performance, especially for casual runners, the ASICS model is likely to cater better to more serious athletes seeking performance-driven footwear.
Fit and Sizing
Both shoes are available in size 8.5, which is ideal for many runners. The ASICS shoe's jacquard mesh upper provides a snug fit, conforming to the foot's shape for a personalized feel. In contrast, the New Balance shoe's mesh upper and no-sew overlays create a sleek and comfortable fit, although it may not encapsulate the foot as tightly as the ASICS model. Depending on individual foot shape and preference for fit, runners might find one model more comfortable than the other.
Durability
Durability is another crucial factor when selecting running shoes. The ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 is built with engineered materials that not only provide comfort but also enhance longevity, making it a worthwhile investment for regular runners. The New Balance shoe features a durable rubber outsole, which is essential for traction and wear resistance. However, considering the advanced materials utilized in the ASICS model, it may offer better longevity and performance over time, particularly for those who log in significant mileage.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX ultimately hinges on your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for advanced cushioning, sustainability, and a shoe that can handle long distances, the ASICS model is worth the investment at $124.95. However, if you're seeking a budget-friendly option that still offers comfort for casual runs, the New Balance shoe at $68.00 is an excellent choice. Each shoe has its merits, and your decision should align with your running habits and budget constraints.

