vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on cushioning and comfort.

The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 offers superior cushioning and sustainability, while the New Balance Roav is more budget-friendly and durable.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced PureGEL technology.

Sustainability

ASICS uses 75% recycled materials.

Performance

ASICS provides better responsiveness for long runs.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running is better

Price

New Balance is $45 cheaper.

Durability

New Balance has NDurance outsole technology.

Fit

New Balance offers a snug bootie construction.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
Price$124.95$79.99
CushioningPureGELFresh Foam
Sustainability75% recycledNot specified
DurabilityStandardNDurance
FitStandardBootie

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe is about 17% cheaper at $79.99. This significant price difference may influence budget-conscious shoppers who are looking for quality running shoes without overspending. With the ASICS shoes being nearly $45 more expensive, buyers need to consider whether the additional features justify the cost.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, both shoes excel but cater to slightly different preferences. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 features a PureGEL technology that provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings, ideal for runners who prioritize a plush feel. In contrast, the New Balance Roav incorporates a fresh foam midsole that offers plush cushioning and absorbs impact, making it great for those who value comfort during their runs. The bootie construction of the Roav wraps around the foot with a soft, sock-like feel, which may appeal to those seeking a snug fit. Ultimately, comfort may come down to personal preference between the two cushioning technologies.

Design and Aesthetics

Aesthetically, both shoes have their unique appeal. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 comes in a Black/Lake Grey color scheme, which is sleek and versatile for everyday wear. On the other hand, the New Balance Roav features a Black/Light Aluminum design that offers a modern, stylish look. Both brands ensure their shoes not only perform well but also look good, appealing to fashion-conscious runners. The choice between the two may come down to individual taste in color and style.

Sustainability

Sustainability is a significant factor in today’s market, and both brands are making strides in eco-friendliness. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is constructed with at least 75% of its main upper material made from recycled content, contributing to reduced waste and carbon emissions. Additionally, the sockliner utilizes a dyeing process that lowers water and carbon usage. Conversely, the New Balance Roav doesn’t highlight significant sustainable practices in its features, focusing more on comfort and performance. For environmentally conscious consumers, the ASICS may be the preferable choice.

Durability

When it comes to durability, the New Balance Roav stands out with its NDurance outsole technology, designed to endure road miles and daily wear effectively. This feature is crucial for runners who frequently log miles and need a reliable shoe that can withstand the test of time. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27, while also durable, does not provide specific details about its outsole technology. Therefore, if long-lasting performance is a priority, the New Balance might offer an edge in this aspect.

Performance

In terms of performance, both shoes cater to different running styles. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is ideal for those looking for soft landings and responsive toe-offs, thanks to its FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning. This feature can enhance the running experience, particularly during longer distances. Meanwhile, the New Balance Roav focuses on impact absorption and a secure fit through its Ultra Heel design, which is beneficial for daily runners. Depending on your specific running needs, one may be more suited to your style than the other.

User Experience

Both the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 and New Balance Roav have garnered favorable sales ranks, with the ASICS at 2393 and the New Balance at 2101. This indicates that both shoes are popular among consumers, reflecting positive user experiences. Customers often appreciate the comfort and fit of both models, but individual reviews may sway opinions based on personal experiences. Therefore, it's essential to consider feedback from other users when making a decision.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe ultimately depends on your priorities. If you’re looking for a shoe that emphasizes sustainability, offers advanced cushioning technology, and you don’t mind spending a bit more, the ASICS may be the right choice for you. However, if you prefer a more budget-friendly option that still delivers comfort and durability for everyday runs, the New Balance Roav is an excellent alternative. Both shoes have their strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners.