ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on cushioning and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers superior cushioning and eco-friendly features, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 provides a more affordable option with reliable comfort.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Gel-Nimbus 27 features advanced eco-friendly cushioning technology.
Sustainability
Made with at least 75% recycled materials.
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank indicates popularity.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running is better
Price
Fresh Foam X 860 V14 is approximately 4% cheaper.
Outsole
Durable rubber outsole designed for varied terrains.
Weight
Lightweight synthetic materials enhance performance.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 27 | Fresh Foam X 860 V14 |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Synthetic |
| Midsole | PureGEL | Fresh Foam X |
| Drop | Not specified | 8 mm |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 present two solid choices for running enthusiasts. The Gel-Nimbus 27 is currently priced at $124.95, while the Fresh Foam X 860 V14 is slightly cheaper at $119.88, making it about 4% less expensive. Both shoes have garnered significant sales ranks, with the Gel-Nimbus at 2,393 and the Fresh Foam X 860 at 13,111. This comparison will delve deeper into their features, comfort, cushioning, and overall design.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort and fit, the Gel-Nimbus 27 excels with its engineered jacquard mesh upper, which wraps the foot with a soft feel. This feature is particularly beneficial for long runs, as it provides breathability and comfort. In contrast, the Fresh Foam X 860 V14 also focuses on comfort with its Fresh Foam X midsole, which delivers an incredibly cushioned experience. Both shoes feature adjustable lace closures for a secure fit, but the Gel-Nimbus 27 offers a slight edge with its superior upper material, which is made from at least 75% recycled content, enhancing both comfort and environmental impact.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning is a critical aspect of any running shoe, and here the Gel-Nimbus 27 showcases its PureGEL technology, which provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings. Additionally, the FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning used in this model is made with approximately 24% bio-based content, promoting a responsive toe-off while being environmentally friendly. Conversely, the Fresh Foam X 860 V14's Fresh Foam X midsole is known for its plush cushioning. However, it does not specify environmental considerations in its materials, focusing more on the comfort aspect. While both shoes offer excellent cushioning, the Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out for its eco-friendly approach.
Durability and Outsole Design
Durability is essential for runners, and both shoes are designed to withstand the rigors of regular use. The Gel-Nimbus 27 features a robust upper design complemented by its cushioned sole, which is engineered for longevity. On the other hand, the Fresh Foam X 860 V14 boasts a durable rubber outsole that is built to handle various terrains. While both shoes are constructed for durability, the Gel-Nimbus 27's focus on using recycled materials adds an extra layer of sustainability that may appeal to environmentally conscious consumers.
Weight and Performance
In terms of weight, neither shoe provides explicit metrics in the details, but both are designed with lightweight materials aimed at enhancing performance. The Gel-Nimbus 27, with its engineered mesh upper, is likely to be lighter on the foot due to its breathable construction. The Fresh Foam X 860 V14 also utilizes lightweight synthetic materials, contributing to its performance. However, the Gel-Nimbus 27's advanced cushioning technology may provide a more responsive and dynamic running experience, which is crucial for runners seeking speed and agility.
Style and Aesthetics
Style is subjective, but both the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 offer appealing aesthetics. The Gel-Nimbus 27 comes in a sleek Black/Lake Grey colorway that resonates with a classic, understated look. In contrast, the Fresh Foam X 860 V14 features a Black/Phantom/Angora combination, which may appeal to those looking for a more vibrant style. While both shoes are designed for performance, their visual appeal can influence a buyer's choice, depending on personal style preferences.
Price Comparison
As previously mentioned, the Gel-Nimbus 27 retails at $124.95, while the Fresh Foam X 860 V14 is priced at $119.88. This price difference of about $5.07 makes the Fresh Foam X 860 V14 approximately 4% less expensive. When considering the features and technology each shoe brings, potential buyers may weigh the price against the specific benefits each model offers. The Gel-Nimbus 27's additional eco-friendly features may justify its higher price for environmentally conscious consumers.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 ultimately depends on individual priorities. If you value sustainability, superior cushioning, and a snug fit, the Gel-Nimbus 27 may be the better option despite its slightly higher price. Conversely, if you seek a well-cushioned shoe with a lower price point and a reliable outsole for varied terrains, the Fresh Foam X 860 V14 could be the way to go. Both shoes excel in their own right, making them worthy contenders in the running shoe market.

