vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on sustainability and price, New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running wins on versatility and design.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers better cushioning, sustainability, and a lower price, making it the preferred choice for many runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS is $20 cheaper than New Balance

Sustainability

ASICS uses recycled materials in construction

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced cushioning technology

Why New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running is better

Versatility

New Balance is marketed as a versatile trainer

Weight

New Balance has a lighter design

Style

New Balance offers a modern aesthetic

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
88
New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running
76

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
ModelGel-Nimbus 27FuelCell Rebel V5
Price$124.95$144.95
Sales Rank239324349
Upper MaterialJacquard MeshFantomFit

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running Shoe, which retails for $144.95. This price difference may be a significant factor for budget-conscious buyers looking for quality running footwear. Although both shoes feature advanced technologies and materials, the ASICS option gives consumers a more economical choice without sacrificing performance.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both shoes offer unique aesthetics that appeal to different preferences. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is available in a Black/Lake Grey color scheme, which provides a classic look suitable for various outfits. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 comes in a Linen/Grey Matter/White combination, giving it a fresh and modern appearance. Ultimately, your personal style will dictate which shoe you find more visually appealing, but both brands have successfully catered to contemporary trends in running shoe design.

Comfort and Fit

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features a soft engineered jacquard mesh upper that wraps the foot comfortably, making it ideal for long runs. The shoe also incorporates PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning and softer landings. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 boasts a FantomFit upper that provides ultra-light bonded support, enhancing the fit for various activities. Both shoes excel in comfort, but the choice may depend on whether you prefer the plush cushioning of the ASICS or the supportive feel of the New Balance.

Performance Technology

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates advanced technologies like the FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, which uses bio-based content for a responsive toe-off. This feature is designed to enhance overall performance during runs. In comparison, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 utilizes FuelCell foam, known for its propulsive feel, helping to drive you forward. Both shoes deliver impressive performance capabilities, but the ASICS model emphasizes cushioning, while the New Balance focuses on a propulsive running experience.

Sustainability

For environmentally conscious consumers, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 stands out with its commitment to sustainability. At least 75% of the shoe's main upper material is made from recycled content, which helps reduce waste and carbon emissions. Additionally, the sockliner is crafted using a solution dyeing process that significantly cuts down water usage and carbon emissions. In contrast, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 does not highlight any sustainable features, making the ASICS a more eco-friendly option for those concerned about their environmental impact.

Sales Rank and Popularity

Sales rank can often indicate a product's popularity and consumer trust. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 has a sales rank of 2393, suggesting that it is well-received in the market. In comparison, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 has a higher sales rank of 24349, indicating it may not be as popular among consumers. While rankings can fluctuate, the ASICS model appears to have a stronger following at this time.

Versatility

Both shoes are designed to cater to a range of activities, but they each have unique strengths. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is particularly suited for long-distance running, thanks to its cushioned design and soft feel. Conversely, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 is marketed as a versatile trainer that can transition seamlessly from longer runs to shorter, spontaneous activities. If you’re looking for a shoe specifically for distance running, the ASICS may take precedence; however, if versatility is your goal, the New Balance could be the better choice.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 ultimately comes down to your specific running needs and preferences. If you prioritize price, cushioning, and sustainability, the ASICS model is the clear winner at $124.95, offering a significant price advantage and eco-friendly features. On the other hand, if you seek a versatile trainer with a propulsive feel for various activities, the New Balance could be more appealing, albeit at a higher price of $144.95. Both shoes are excellent choices, but your ideal pair largely depends on what aspects of running shoes are most important to you.