ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Saucony Women's Ride 18 Sneaker, Vanilla, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on fit and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers advanced cushioning and a snug fit, while the Saucony Women's Ride 18 is a more affordable option with solid comfort.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is more advanced but pricier.
Cushioning
ASICS features PureGEL technology.
Eco-friendliness
ASICS uses recycled materials.
Why Saucony Women's Ride 18 Sneaker, Vanilla, 9 is better
Affordability
Saucony is $35 cheaper.
Weight
Saucony is lighter.
Durability
Saucony has increased XT-900 coverage.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Saucony Women's Ride 18 Sneaker, Vanilla, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Model | Gel-Nimbus 27 | Ride 18 |
| Current Price | $124.95 | $89.00 |
| Sales Rank | 2393 | 7007 |
| Upper Material | Jacquard mesh | Engineered mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the Saucony Women's Ride 18 Sneaker is more budget-friendly at $89.00. This means that the ASICS model is approximately 40% more expensive than the Saucony option. For those looking to save money without sacrificing comfort, the Saucony sneaker presents a compelling choice. However, the higher price of the ASICS may reflect their advanced features and technology, which some runners might find worth the investment.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 features an engineered jacquard mesh upper that wraps the foot softly, showcasing a sleek Black/Lake Grey color scheme. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Ride 18 has a clean and modern engineered mesh design in a Vanilla color, providing a more traditional look. Both shoes focus on comfort and fit, but the ASICS may appeal more to those who prioritize a contemporary and sophisticated aesthetic, while the Saucony offers a timeless design that can blend with various outfits.
Comfort and Cushioning
ASICS emphasizes comfort in its Gel-Nimbus 27 with PureGEL technology, which provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings. Additionally, the FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning enhances responsiveness with about 24% bio-based content, promoting a softer landing. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Ride 18 incorporates PWRRUN+, an advanced, beaded foam that delivers exceptional cushioning and durability. Both shoes provide a comfortable ride, but ASICS may slightly edge out with its focus on eco-friendly materials while still enhancing performance.
Fit and Stability
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is designed to wrap the foot comfortably, promoting a secure fit. This shoe's upper material is made with at least 75% recycled content, contributing not only to the fit but also to its eco-friendliness. The Saucony Women's Ride 18 features a traditional hourglass shape for a well-cushioned ride, with an 8mm offset that facilitates a smooth transition from heel to toe. While both shoes offer stability, the ASICS may provide a more snug fit due to its unique upper design, making it a better option for those seeking extra security.
Durability
Durability is a strong point for both models. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is crafted with materials that reduce waste and carbon emissions, suggesting a focus on longevity and sustainable practices. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women's Ride 18 features increased XT-900 coverage from heel to toe, enhancing its protective capabilities and overall durability. Runners looking for shoes that will endure wear and tear will find both options appealing, but the Saucony may have a slight advantage in terms of durability due to its reinforced outsole.
Performance and Responsiveness
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is engineered for responsive running with its advanced cushioning technologies. The PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO work together to ensure a softer landing and an energetic toe-off. In comparison, the Saucony Women's Ride 18's PWRRUN+ foam offers a responsive ride that has been refined over two decades, making it the most comfortable and responsive model in its line. Runners who prioritize a combination of soft landings and responsiveness may find the ASICS model particularly beneficial.
Sales Ranking
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 has a bestseller rank of 2393, while the Saucony Women's Ride 18 sits at a higher rank of 7007. A lower sales rank for the ASICS indicates it is currently more popular among consumers, potentially reflecting its superior technology and features. However, the Saucony may appeal to a broader audience due to its affordability and comfortable fit, suggesting that while it may not be a bestseller, it still holds significant value for many runners.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the Saucony Women's Ride 18 ultimately depends on your priorities. If you are willing to invest in advanced cushioning technology and a snug fit, the ASICS model may be worth the higher price of $124.95. However, if you are looking for a more affordable option without sacrificing comfort, the Saucony sneaker at $89.00 is about 40% cheaper and still offers excellent cushioning and durability. Consider your budget, style preferences, and intended use to make the best choice for your running needs.

