ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and comfort, Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 wins on breathability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers superior cushioning and eco-friendly materials, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is a more budget-friendly option with excellent shock absorption.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features advanced PureGEL technology.
Sustainability
ASICS uses recycled materials in its upper.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a significantly higher bestseller rank.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Price
Saucony is $5 cheaper.
Breathability
Saucony has a more breathable mesh upper.
Shock Absorption
Saucony uses premium PWRRUN+ foam.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Cushioning Tech | PureGEL | PWRRUN+ |
| Eco-Friendly | Yes | No |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker is about 4% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes. Priced at $119.95, the Saucony model is a more budget-friendly option compared to ASICS's $124.95. This slight difference may appeal to those who are looking to save a few dollars without compromising on quality. Both products are competitively priced within the running shoe market, but if saving money is a priority, the Saucony options present a compelling choice.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 offers a unique PureGEL technology that provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings, making it ideal for runners who prioritize comfort. This shoe also features FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, which incorporates approximately 24% bio-based content for added responsiveness. In comparison, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is built with premium PWRRUN+ foam which promotes maximum cushioning and excellent energy return. Both shoes aim to deliver a plush running experience, but the ASICS model focuses on eco-friendly materials while the Saucony emphasizes shock absorption and energy return.
Upper Construction
The upper construction of these shoes highlights their respective brands' design philosophies. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 incorporates an engineered jacquard mesh upper that wraps the foot softly, with at least 75% of the shoe's main upper material made from recycled content. This not only enhances comfort but also contributes to sustainability. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 features a breathable engineered mesh upper that promotes airflow and adapts to the foot for a secure fit. While both provide comfort and breathability, the ASICS model stands out for its eco-conscious design.
Durability and Traction
Durability and traction are essential factors in any running shoe, and both models deliver in this regard. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 has a design that supports long-lasting wear, but specific details on the outsole's material are not provided. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is equipped with a high-abrasion rubber outsole that offers reliable grip and long-lasting durability. This may make the Saucony a better option for those who frequently run on varied urban surfaces or rough terrains, ensuring that they maintain traction with each step.
Fit and Sizing
In terms of fit, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 comes in a size 8.5, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is available in a size 9. The differences in sizing may affect how each shoe fits various foot shapes and sizes. The ASICS shoe's jacquard mesh upper is designed to provide a soft feel and wrap around the foot, potentially offering a snugger fit for those who prefer a more secure feel. In contrast, the Saucony model's breathable mesh adapts to the foot, which could be more appealing for those seeking a comfortable, flexible fit over long distances.
Performance for Running
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 appears to be optimized for a soft landing and smooth transitions, thanks to its advanced cushioning technologies. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22, with its neutral running shoe design, focuses on stability and smooth transitions, making it ideal for daily training and longer runs. Both shoes cater to different running styles; the ASICS is likely better suited for those who prioritize plush cushioning, while the Saucony may appeal to runners looking for a balanced and responsive ride.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Brand reputation plays a significant role in consumer choice, and the sales ranks of these products reflect their popularity. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 holds a bestseller rank of 2393, indicating a solid position in the market, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is ranked at 34383, suggesting it is less popular in comparison. This difference in sales rank may influence buyers who trust higher-selling products based on user feedback and brand loyalty. ASICS has a long-standing reputation for running shoes, which could sway consumers in its favor.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 ultimately depends on your priorities as a runner. If sustainability and plush cushioning are paramount for you, the ASICS model's eco-friendly materials and superior cushioning technologies might be the better fit. However, if you're seeking a more budget-friendly option with excellent shock absorption and a breathable design, the Saucony model is a strong contender. Both shoes offer unique advantages, so consider your individual needs, such as fit, performance, and price, before making your decision.

