ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on weight and cushioning, Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running wins on price and support.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels in cushioning and lightweight design, while the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 offers superior support and a more spacious fit. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features PureGEL technology that is 65% softer than standard.
Weight
ASICS is approximately 25g lighter than its predecessor.
Design
ASICS has a modern and sleek colorway.
Why Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running is better
Support
Brooks includes GuideRails technology for joint support.
Fit
Brooks offers a roomy toe box for various foot shapes.
Price
Brooks is $30 cheaper than ASICS.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 Supportive Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Current Price | $169.95 | $139.95 |
| Sales Rank | 11265 | 21661 |
| Cushion Type | PureGEL | BioMoGo DNA |
| Toe Box | Snug | Roomy |
Dimension comparison
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort and cushioning, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes offer a superior experience thanks to their advanced cushioning technologies. The shoe features PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, providing an incredibly cushioned feel. In contrast, the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 is designed with BioMoGo DNA cushioning that adapts to the runner's stride, weight, and speed, allowing for a personalized cushioning experience. While both shoes are engineered for comfort, the ASICS model stands out with its combination of FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and the lightweight design, making it ideal for longer runs.
Fit and Sizing
The fit and sizing of a running shoe can significantly impact performance and comfort. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers a snug fit with its engineered knit upper that wraps the foot securely while allowing for breathability. However, the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 is specifically designed with a roomy toe box to accommodate various foot shapes, including those needing orthotics. At a size 9 wide, it provides extra space, making it suitable for runners with unique fitting requirements. Therefore, if a more spacious fit is your priority, the Brooks shoe may be the better choice.
Support and Stability
In terms of support and stability, the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 is engineered with innovative GuideRails support technology, which minimizes excess joint movement during runs. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners prone to knee injuries, as it adds stability beyond the feet. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28, while providing excellent cushioning, does not specifically focus on joint support. If you need a shoe that prioritizes support during your runs, the Brooks model offers more targeted features for stability.
Breathability
Breathability is crucial for maintaining comfort during runs, especially in warmer conditions. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 utilizes an engineered knit upper that allows for airflow, keeping the feet cool. Similarly, the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 incorporates a 3D Fit Print and engineered Air Mesh to promote breathability. However, the ASICS model may provide a slightly more breathable experience due to its lightweight knit material. For runners who prioritize ventilation, both shoes perform well, but the ASICS might have a slight edge.
Price Comparison
Price can often be a deciding factor when selecting running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 retails for $169.95, whereas the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 is available for $139.95. This makes the Brooks model about 17% cheaper than the ASICS shoe, offering substantial savings for budget-conscious runners. While the ASICS shoe comes with advanced cushioning technology, the Brooks shoe still provides excellent support at a lower price point, making it a compelling option for those looking to save.
Weight
Weight is another essential factor to consider when choosing running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is approximately 25g lighter than its predecessor, enhancing its overall comfort and making it easier to maintain speed over longer distances. However, the specific weight of the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 is not provided. Generally, a lighter shoe can contribute to better performance, especially for long-distance runners who prioritize speed and endurance. If lightweight performance is a significant factor for you, the ASICS may be the more appealing choice.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetics can play a significant role in a runner's choice of footwear. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 comes in a Mineral Beige/Cream colorway, offering a sleek and modern look that can be versatile for casual wear. On the other hand, the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 is available in an Oyster/Peacoat/Lilac Rose combination, which may appeal to those looking for a more colorful and vibrant option. Ultimately, the choice between the two may come down to personal style preferences, as both shoes offer unique and attractive designs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women's Addiction GTS 15 comes down to individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize advanced cushioning and a lightweight design for long-distance runs, the ASICS model may be the better fit, despite its higher price of $169.95. Conversely, if you need a supportive shoe that accommodates various foot shapes, especially for those requiring extra room, the Brooks model at $139.95 offers excellent value. Ultimately, both shoes excel in their respective areas, and your decision should be guided by your specific running needs.

