ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on comfort and cushioning, Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral wins on traction.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and a lighter design, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 excels in weather resistance and affordability.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
FF BLAST PLUS cushioning provides a plush feel.
Weight
Approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor.
Brand Reputation
ASICS is well-known for high-quality running shoes.
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral is better
Price
Brooks Ghost 16 is significantly cheaper.
Weather Resistance
DWR mesh upper protects against elements.
Traction
Enhanced wet/dry traction for diverse conditions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | FF BLAST PLUS | DNA Loft v3 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Knit | DWR Mesh |
| Weight | Lightweight | Standard |
| Price | $169.95 | $103.23 |
| Sales Rank | 11265 | 5547 |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and Brooks Women’s Ghost 16
When it comes to running shoes, both the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized offer unique features tailored to enhance your running experience. The Gel-Nimbus 28, priced at $169.95, is designed for ultimate comfort and cushioning, while the Ghost 16, available for about $103.23, focuses on weatherproofing and traction. These contrasting approaches make each shoe appealing to different types of runners.
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 is significantly more budget-friendly, retailing for $103.23, which is about 39% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 at $169.95. This price difference may influence your decision if you are looking for a well-cushioned shoe without breaking the bank. While the Gel-Nimbus 28 offers advanced cushioning technology, the Ghost 16 provides excellent value for those who prioritize weather protection and versatility in various conditions.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels with its FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and PureGEL technology, ensuring a soft and responsive ride. This shoe is about 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, enhancing its overall comfort, especially for long-distance runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 boasts nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which delivers lightweight comfort and neutral support. Both shoes prioritize cushioning, but the Gel-Nimbus 28 might be better suited for those who prefer a plush feel underfoot.
Traction and Weather Resistance
The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 stands out with its enhanced wet/dry traction capabilities, making it ideal for various weather conditions. Its DWR mesh upper not only provides weather protection but also manages temperature effectively. This feature is crucial for runners who often face unpredictable weather. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 does not specifically highlight weather resistance, focusing instead on its lightweight and breathable upper. If your runs frequently involve wet or slippery conditions, the Ghost 16 may be the better choice.
Fit and Upper Design
Both shoes offer a distinct approach to fit and upper design. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features an engineered knit upper that wraps around the foot for a secure yet comfortable fit. This design reduces the need for additional overlays, enhancing breathability. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 includes a knit DWR mesh upper that not only provides comfort but also shields against the elements. While the Gel-Nimbus 28 leans more towards a snug fit, the Ghost 16 ensures a balance of comfort and protection, catering to different runner preferences.
Weight and Performance
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, which contributes to its performance for longer runs. This lightweight design, combined with its advanced cushioning technologies, promotes a smoother running experience. The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16, while not explicitly mentioned for weight, focuses on delivering a distraction-free ride through its soft midsole and Segmented Crash Pad. If you value a lighter shoe for speed work or long distances, the Gel-Nimbus 28 may have the edge.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 has a higher sales rank, sitting at 5547 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 at 11265. This indicates that more consumers may be gravitating towards the Ghost 16, possibly due to its combination of features and lower price point. Popularity can often reflect overall customer satisfaction, so it’s worth considering what other users have experienced with each shoe.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize superior cushioning and a lighter shoe for long distances, the Gel-Nimbus 28 is an excellent option despite its higher price. Conversely, if you need a more budget-friendly, weather-resistant shoe with reliable traction, the Ghost 16 is the clear winner. By weighing your running habits and preferences, you can make an informed decision that best suits your needs.

