ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated July 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on price, Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on comfort and weight.
The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 offers a more budget-friendly option with solid comfort, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels in advanced cushioning technology.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is more expensive by about 55%.
Cushioning
Gel-Nimbus 28 has advanced cushioning technology.
Weight
Gel-Nimbus 28 is lighter than its predecessor.
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Ghost 17 is about 35% cheaper.
Sales Rank
Ghost 17 has a significantly higher sales rank.
Eco-Friendly
Ghost 17 uses recycled materials in its outsole.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | PureGEL & FF BLAST PLUS | DNA LOFT v3 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Knit | Double Jacquard Mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | Recycled Rubber |
| Sales Rank | 11265 | 61 |
| Weight | Approx. 25g lighter | Not specified |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is significantly cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28. The Ghost 17 retails for $110.00, while the Gel-Nimbus 28 is priced at $169.95, making the Brooks shoe about 35% less expensive. This considerable price difference makes the Ghost 17 a compelling option for budget-conscious runners looking for a reliable everyday shoe without compromising on quality.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Ghost 17 prioritize comfort, but they achieve it through different technologies. The Gel-Nimbus 28 features PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, and FF BLAST PLUS cushioning for a cloud-like feel. In contrast, the Ghost 17 utilizes nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, designed to provide lightweight softness and comfort. Runners who prioritize a plush experience may lean towards the Gel-Nimbus 28, while those looking for dynamic cushioning might prefer the Ghost 17.
Upper Design and Breathability
The upper construction differs significantly between the two shoes. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 boasts an engineered knit upper that is lightweight and breathable, reducing the need for overlays and ensuring a snug fit. On the other hand, the Brooks Ghost 17 features a double jacquard air mesh upper, which promotes airflow and adapts to the foot's movements for a customizable fit. While both options emphasize breathability, the material choice may appeal to different preferences, with ASICS being more focused on minimal overlays and Brooks providing a structured yet flexible design.
Weight and Performance
Weight is an important factor for runners, especially during long-distance runs. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, enhancing its performance for longer runs. While the Ghost 17 does not specify its weight, its design aims for smooth transitions and comfort, making it suitable for various activities beyond running. The Gel-Nimbus 28's focus on a lighter feel may attract serious runners looking for speed, while the Ghost 17 caters to a broader audience, including walkers and casual runners.
Durability and Outsole
Durability is crucial for running shoes, and both models have unique approaches to their outsoles. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 features a synthetic rubber outsole designed to provide traction and longevity. Meanwhile, the Brooks Ghost 17 incorporates an innovative rubber compound made with recycled silica, balancing durability with lightweight performance. This eco-friendly aspect of the Ghost 17 may appeal to environmentally conscious consumers, while the Gel-Nimbus 28's traditional rubber design ensures reliability on various terrains.
Fit and Sizing
Fit can significantly affect performance, and both shoes offer unique sizing experiences. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is available in various widths and is noted for its snug fit, thanks to the engineered knit upper. The Brooks Ghost 17 is also designed with a comfortable fit in mind, featuring a kick-back collar that adds support while maintaining a snug feel. Runners may find that the Gel-Nimbus 28's construction provides a more tailored fit, whereas the Ghost 17 offers a more adaptable design that accommodates different foot shapes.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Brand reputation can influence purchasing decisions, and both ASICS and Brooks have established themselves as reputable running shoe manufacturers. The Gel-Nimbus 28 has a sales rank of 11,265, while the Ghost 17 is significantly higher at 61, indicating that it is a popular choice among consumers. This higher rank suggests that the Ghost 17 may have a broader appeal, potentially due to its price point and versatile design, making it a reliable option for a wider audience.
Which should you buy?
In deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17, consider your priorities. If budget is a concern, the Ghost 17 is about 35% cheaper and offers solid cushioning and comfort for everyday use. However, if you seek advanced cushioning technology and a lighter shoe for serious running, the Gel-Nimbus 28 may be worth the investment. Ultimately, your specific needs and preferences will guide your choice, but both options deliver quality performance for runners.

