ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe wins on price and weight.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and support for serious runners, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 is a budget-friendly option for casual use.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Advanced PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS technology
Support
Includes OrthoLite X-55 sockliner for moisture management
Durability
Constructed with durable synthetic rubber outsole
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $69.99
Weight
Lighter overall design for casual use
Sleek Fit
No-sew construction for a streamlined look
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Price | $169.95 | $69.99 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Upper | Engineered Knit | Precision Knit |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | Integrated Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to ASICS and New Balance
When it comes to running shoes, both ASICS and New Balance are trusted brands that offer a variety of options tailored to different needs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes are priced at $169.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe comes at a significantly lower price of $69.99, making it about 59% cheaper. This price difference reflects the distinct features and technologies each shoe provides, catering to different types of runners and their requirements.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is designed with advanced cushioning technology, incorporating PureGEL technology and FF BLAST PLUS cushioning. This combination delivers a softer and lighter experience, making it feel like running on clouds. The shoe is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, enhancing overall comfort for longer runs. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 features Fresh Foam midsole foam, which also provides an ultra-cushioned and lightweight ride. However, it lacks the specialized technology found in the ASICS model, potentially making the Gel-Nimbus 28 a better choice for serious long-distance runners seeking superior cushioning.
Upper Design and Breathability
In terms of upper design, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 utilizes an engineered knit upper that is both lightweight and breathable, reducing the need for additional overlays. This design not only ensures a secure fit but also enhances airflow, thereby keeping your feet cool during runs. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 features a precision-engineered knit upper with no-sew construction, providing targeted ventilation and a sleek fit. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS model may offer better breathability due to its focus on airflow.
Fit and Support
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 includes an OrthoLite X-55 sockliner, which enhances cushioning performance and moisture management, creating a cooler and drier environment for your feet. This added support is particularly beneficial for runners who require extra stability during their runs. Meanwhile, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 is designed with an integrated rubber outsole for enhanced underfoot comfort, but it doesn’t feature the same level of specialized support as the ASICS model. Therefore, for runners needing more structured support, the Gel-Nimbus 28 may prove to be the better option.
Durability and Construction
The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is constructed with durable materials that are designed to withstand the rigors of long-distance running. The synthetic rubber outsole contributes to its durability, ensuring longevity even with extensive use. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 is also built for durability but may not match the longevity of the ASICS model due to the differences in construction materials and technologies. For dedicated runners who frequently log miles, the ASICS offering could be the more reliable choice.
Performance in Different Conditions
When evaluating performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels in providing cushioning and support for longer runs, making it ideal for various running conditions. Its reflective details also enhance visibility during early morning or nighttime runs, adding a layer of safety for outdoor runners. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8, while suitable for everyday runs and workouts, may not perform as well under extreme conditions due to its lack of advanced cushioning technology. Thus, for runners who prioritize performance across diverse environments, the Gel-Nimbus 28 stands out.
Price and Value
At $169.95, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28 is positioned as a premium running shoe, reflecting its advanced technology and features. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8, priced at $69.99, offers a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing comfort. This price difference of about $99 highlights the value proposition of each shoe, catering to different types of runners. While the ASICS model provides superior technology for serious runners, the New Balance shoe is an excellent choice for casual runners or those new to the sport looking for comfort at a lower price point.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe boils down to your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, support, and durability for long-distance running, the ASICS model is worth the investment. However, if you're looking for a reliable and comfortable shoe for everyday use without breaking the bank, the New Balance option is an excellent choice. Each shoe has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners.

