ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on fit and comfort.
The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 offers superior performance features and comfort, making it the better choice for serious runners. However, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is a more budget-friendly option.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is $15 cheaper than Brooks
Cushioning
AMPLIFOAM PLUS offers a softer ride
Style
ASICS has a more traditional design
Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Performance
Brooks features Segmented Crash Pad for smooth transitions
Popularity
Brooks has a better sales rank of 3,377
Breathability
Brooks has an updated engineered air mesh upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | AMPLIFOAM PLUS | DNA Midsole |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Engineered Air Mesh |
| Shock Absorption | Rearfoot GEL | Segmented Crash Pad |
| Comfort | Good | Excellent |
| Design | Traditional | Streamlined |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are designed for comfort and support, making them a solid choice for daily wear. Priced at $69.95, they offer a good balance of features for both casual and serious runners. The shoe incorporates Rearfoot GEL technology that provides cushioning and shock absorption, which is essential for a comfortable running experience. With a sales rank of 12,467, they are moderately popular among consumers who appreciate their blend of style and functionality.
Overview of Brooks Women’s Anthem 7
The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe is a performance-oriented option priced at $84.93. It features lightweight DNA midsole cushioning, which significantly reduces underfoot pressure, making it ideal for runners who prioritize comfort and efficiency. This shoe has a better sales rank of 3,377, indicating a higher popularity and preference among users who seek both performance and comfort in their running shoes.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7, making it a more budget-friendly option at $69.95 versus $84.93. This price difference could be significant for casual runners or those just starting, as they may not want to invest heavily in their footwear. However, for those willing to spend a bit more, the Brooks option offers advanced features that may justify the higher price.
Comfort Features
When it comes to comfort, both shoes offer impressive features, but they cater to different preferences. The ASICS Women’s Gel-Pulse 17 includes AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which aims to provide a softer ride, while the Rearfoot GEL technology enhances shock absorption. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 focuses on its lightweight DNA midsole cushioning designed to decrease underfoot pressure, promoting an effortless run. The choice here largely depends on whether a runner prefers a softer, cushioned experience or a lightweight, responsive feel.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability plays a crucial role in running shoes, and both options offer distinct advantages. The ASICS shoe features a mesh upper that contributes to ventilation, providing a comfortable fit during extended wear. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 boasts an updated engineered air mesh upper that balances stretch and structure, ensuring breathability while maintaining an accommodating fit. Runners who prioritize a snug yet breathable fit may lean towards the Brooks, while those who prefer a more traditional mesh feel may opt for the ASICS.
Performance and Transition
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is specifically designed for smooth transitions with its Segmented Crash Pad feature. This design helps adapt to the foot's landing, making it particularly appealing for those focused on maximizing efficiency during their runs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, while comfortable, does not emphasize this feature, which could make the Brooks a better choice for performance-driven runners looking for a streamlined experience.
Popularity and User Reviews
Popularity can often indicate the quality of a product, and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 outperforms the ASICS shoe with a significantly better sales rank of 3,377 compared to 12,467. This suggests that users may generally prefer the Brooks option for its combination of comfort and performance features. Customer feedback typically highlights the Brooks for its cushioning and overall fit, making it a trusted choice among serious runners.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 hinges on your specific needs as a runner. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that offers solid comfort for everyday use, the ASICS shoe is a great choice at $69.95. However, if your focus is on performance and you’re willing to invest a bit more for advanced cushioning and smooth transitions, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is worth considering at $84.93. Both shoes have their merits, but your running style and comfort preferences will ultimately guide your choice.

