ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on price and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers a more affordable option with solid cushioning, while the Brooks Women's Anthem 8 excels in advanced cushioning and breathability.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is $20 cheaper than Brooks
Cushioning
ASICS features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning
Durability
Molded rubber outsole for traction
Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks has upgraded DNA LOFT v2 foam
Breathability
Lightweight performance mesh upper
Versatility
Designed for various fitness activities
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Pulse 17 | Anthem 8 |
| Sales Rank | 12467 | 4355 |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Performance Mesh |
| Outsole | Molded Rubber | RoadTack Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe, which costs $89.95. For budget-conscious consumers, this price difference may influence their decision. While both shoes are positioned for runners seeking comfort and performance, the lower price point of the ASICS shoes could make them more appealing for those looking to save money while still investing in quality footwear.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both shoes offer distinct cushioning technologies designed to enhance comfort during runs. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which provides a soft and comfortable ride. This model also includes Rearfoot GEL technology, designed to absorb shock, making it suitable for daily wear. In contrast, the Brooks Anthem 8 boasts upgraded DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam, providing a softer and more balanced experience underfoot. This shoe is crafted specifically for smooth heel-to-toe transitions, which can be especially beneficial for runners focused on maintaining a fluid stride. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks may edge out in terms of advanced cushioning technology.
Fit and Breathability
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 has a mesh upper that offers breathability and a comfortable fit. However, the Brooks Anthem 8 takes this feature a step further with a lightweight performance mesh upper that improves airflow and conforms to the foot's shape, ensuring a secure fit even during warmer weather training sessions. If breathability and fit are top priorities for you, the Brooks Anthem 8 is likely to deliver a better experience, especially for workouts in hot climates.
Durability and Outsole Design
Durability is a critical factor when selecting running shoes, and both options offer features that enhance their longevity. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 comes with a molded rubber outsole that provides traction and durability. On the other hand, the Brooks Anthem 8 features a RoadTack rubber outsole, designed to deliver reliable grip on various surfaces while maintaining a lightweight feel. Given that the Brooks has a bestseller rank of 4,355, it indicates a level of popularity that may suggest its durability has been tested and proven among users.
Target Audience
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed for runners who appreciate comfort and shock absorption, making it ideal for everyday wear and casual runners. Conversely, the Brooks Anthem 8 targets budget-conscious runners and those transitioning from walking to running. This shoe is presented as a stylish introduction to performance running, making it suitable for a broader audience, including beginners and casual fitness enthusiasts. Depending on your experience level and running goals, one shoe may be more suited to your needs than the other.
Performance and Versatility
When it comes to performance, both shoes excel in their respective categories. The ASICS Gel-Pulse 17 is engineered for comfort during daily wear, with features that support shock absorption and cushioning. Conversely, the Brooks Anthem 8 is designed to support various activities, from everyday miles to casual fitness routines, thanks to its soft ride and breathability. If versatility and performance across different activities are essential to you, the Brooks Anthem 8 may provide a more well-rounded option.
Aesthetic Appeal
Style can be an important factor in choosing running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac color scheme that balances functionality with aesthetic appeal. Alternatively, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 features a striking Atlantic Deep/Skyway/Pink combination, which may attract those looking for a more vibrant and stylish option. Ultimately, personal preference will dictate which design resonates more with individual buyers, but both options deliver on contemporary style.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a more affordable option with solid cushioning and durability, the ASICS may be the better choice. On the other hand, if you value advanced cushioning, breathability, and a stylish design for various fitness activities, the Brooks Anthem 8 is worth the higher investment. Each shoe has its unique advantages, making it essential to consider what features matter most to you as a runner.

