ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is the more economical choice at $59.99, making it about 17% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, which are priced at $69.95. For budget-conscious shoppers or those looking for a versatile shoe that won’t break the bank, the New Balance model provides an attractive option without sacrificing quality. Meanwhile, the ASICS shoe, while slightly more expensive, offers features that may appeal to runners willing to invest a bit more for enhanced comfort and performance.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes stand out with their Rearfoot GEL technology, which provides excellent shock absorption and cushioning. This feature is designed to enhance comfort during extended wear, making it ideal for long runs or daily use. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 utilizes fresh foam cushioning that promises responsive comfort mile after mile. While both shoes focus on cushioning, the ASICS offers a specific shock-attenuating layer that may benefit those who prioritize impact absorption in their running experience.

Breathability

Both shoes are designed with breathability in mind. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 incorporates a mesh upper that allows for airflow, helping to keep your feet comfortable during extended runs. Similarly, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 features a breathable mesh that ensures your feet stay cool and dry during workouts. While both options effectively manage moisture and temperature, the ASICS model may provide a slight edge with its additional focus on advanced moisture management through its OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner.

Weight and Design

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is notably lightweight, weighing just over 200 grams, which can contribute to a less burdensome running experience. This aspect makes it an appealing choice for runners who value agility and speed. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, although not specified in weight, emphasizes comfort with its AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning that enhances the overall ride. While both shoes are designed to be functional and stylish, the New Balance’s lightweight nature may appeal more to performance-focused athletes.

Traction and Outsole

When it comes to traction, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a molded rubber outsole designed for durability. This construction is intended for reliable grip across various surfaces, making it a solid choice for diverse running conditions. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 also boasts a durable rubber outsole that provides dependable traction. Both shoes are built for performance; however, the specific design elements of the ASICS may give it an advantage for runners who frequently face varying terrains.

Fit and Adjustability

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 includes a simple lace-up closure that allows for easy adjustments to fit your foot securely and comfortably. This design is particularly beneficial for runners who may require a customized fit during their activities. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is noted for its no-sew details that enhance the overall comfort and fit. While both shoes offer effective ways to achieve a snug fit, the New Balance’s adjustable lace-up system might provide a more tailored experience for different foot shapes.

Sales Rank and Popularity

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 has a significantly better sales rank at 3,173, compared to ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, which is ranked at 12,467. This difference indicates that the New Balance shoe is more popular among consumers, potentially due to its attractive price point and performance features. While sales rank can be influenced by various factors, the popularity of the New Balance model suggests a strong consumer preference, which could be a deciding factor for those in the market for running shoes.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, your choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe will largely depend on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize superior cushioning and advanced moisture management, the ASICS may be worth the extra cost. However, if you’re looking for a lightweight, budget-friendly option that delivers reliable performance, the New Balance stands out as an excellent choice. Ultimately, both shoes offer solid features for runners, making them worthy contenders in the running shoe market.