ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

When comparing the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe, the ASICS model is about 4% cheaper at $69.95 compared to New Balance's price of $72.24. This price difference of approximately $2.29 may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. Although the price gap is not significant, every dollar can count, especially for those purchasing multiple pairs or needing to stick to a budget.

Comfort Features

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 emphasizes comfort through its AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which provides a soft and comfortable ride, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 utilizes precision-engineered Fresh Foam midsole cushioning designed for an ultra-cushioned experience. Both shoes aim to enhance comfort during your runs, but the ASICS focuses on shock absorption with its Rearfoot GEL technology. This specific aspect may make the ASICS more appealing to runners who prioritize cushioning and support during high-impact activities.

Upper Material and Breathability

In terms of upper materials, the ASICS model features a mesh upper, while the New Balance shoe boasts a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper. The breathable nature of both options is crucial for maintaining comfort during extended wear. However, the New Balance shoe explicitly highlights its textile upper's breathability, which may provide an edge for runners in warmer climates or those who tend to sweat more. Thus, if breathability is a primary concern, the New Balance could be the better choice.

Outsole Durability

In terms of outsole durability, the ASICS features a molded rubber outsole designed to withstand various surfaces and conditions. On the other hand, the New Balance shoe also includes an integrated rubber outsole that supports underfoot comfort. While both shoes offer a durable outsole, the ASICS’s molded rubber design may allow for better traction and longevity, making it potentially more suitable for varying terrains. Runners who frequently tackle uneven or rugged paths might find the ASICS better suited for their needs.

Weight Considerations

Weight plays a significant role in running shoe performance. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is described as lightweight, which could enhance speed and agility during runs. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 does not explicitly mention its weight, making it difficult to determine how it compares in terms of lightness. Generally, a lighter shoe can lead to less fatigue over long distances. If weight is a critical factor for you, the New Balance may have the advantage based on its design.

Sales Rank Insights

The sales rank of the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is 12,467, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 has a slightly lower rank at 13,435. This difference suggests that the ASICS model is more popular among consumers, which could indicate broader satisfaction or more favorable reviews. A higher sales rank may lead some buyers to feel more confident in their purchase, knowing that others have chosen the ASICS model over its competitor.

Style and Aesthetics

When it comes to style, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac color scheme, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is available in various colorways. The choice of aesthetics can be subjective, so potential buyers should consider which design resonates more with their personal style. The ASICS offers a modern look with its mesh upper, while the New Balance’s premium engineered mesh might appeal to those who prefer a sleek design. Ultimately, this choice may come down to personal preference.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize cushioning and shock absorption, the ASICS model may serve you better, thanks to its AMPLIFOAM PLUS and Rearfoot GEL technology. However, if breathability and a lightweight feel are more critical, the New Balance offers advantages in these areas. Also, with a lower price point, the ASICS could be more appealing for budget-conscious shoppers. Consider your running habits and preferences carefully to make the best choice for your needs.