ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, making them about 53% cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe, which retails for $149.95. This significant price difference may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers. While the ASICS model offers a more economical choice, the New Balance shoe justifies its higher price point with advanced cushioning technology and a structured upper.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 excels with its Fresh Foam X midsole foam, designed to deliver an incredible cushioning experience. This model is aimed at providing maximum comfort during long runs. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning and Rearfoot GEL technology, offering good shock absorption and a comfortable fit, but it may not match the plush feel of the New Balance shoe. If superior cushioning is your priority, the New Balance is likely the better option.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in a Gravel/Lilac color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a stylish yet understated look. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15, while less specified in color, is known for its structured yet breathable upper, making it a versatile choice for various outfits. Both shoes have their unique appeal, but if aesthetics are important, personal preference will play a significant role.

Breathability and Fit

The New Balance shoe features a structured yet breathable upper, which is essential for runners looking to keep their feet cool and comfortable during workouts. The ASICS model has a mesh upper that also contributes to breathability. However, the ASICS shoe is designed with no-sew details for a more comfortable fit, which could enhance the overall wearing experience, especially during longer runs. Both shoes offer breathability, but the choice may depend on the type of fit you prefer.

Weight and Performance

While specific weight details are not provided, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed for good comfort during daily wear and offers modifications for improved impact absorption. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 is built as a cushioned runner, emphasizing performance with its structured design. If you're looking for a shoe that's lightweight and focused on performance, the New Balance may be the better choice for you.

Sales Rank and Popularity

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 has a sales rank of 12,467, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 is ranked higher at 6,878. This indicates that the New Balance shoe is more popular among consumers, potentially due to its advanced features and performance capabilities. If you're inclined to choose a shoe that others are gravitating towards, the New Balance might be the more appealing option.

Versatility

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed for daily wear, making it a versatile option for casual runners or those who need a comfortable shoe for various activities. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 is specifically tailored for running, providing a structured fit and superior cushioning for performance. If you require a shoe for multiple uses, the ASICS will likely serve you better, whereas the New Balance is ideal for serious runners.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs. If budget is a primary concern, the ASICS model at $69.95 is significantly more affordable and provides solid comfort for everyday use. However, if you're looking for enhanced cushioning and performance for serious running, the New Balance shoe, priced at $149.95, offers superior technology and support. Consider what features matter most to you and make a decision based on your running habits and budget.