ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, vs Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova
Updated August 2026 — Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova leads on cushioning and support.
The Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour offers superior comfort and ease of maintenance, making it a better choice for many users.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
ASICS is slightly more expensive.
Cushioning
ASICS has Rearfoot GEL technology.
Durability
ASICS has a molded rubber outsole.
Why Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova is better
Sales Rank
Skechers has a significantly higher sales rank.
Weight
Skechers features a lightweight design.
Maintenance
Skechers is machine washable.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, | Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Skechers |
| Upper | Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Cushioning | Rearfoot GEL | Air-Cooled Goga Mat |
| Outsole | Molded Rubber | NRT |
| Washable | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, while the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour is about 3% cheaper at $67.74. Both shoes cater to women looking for comfort and support during their athletic activities, but they have distinct features that may appeal to different users. The ASICS model has a bestseller rank of 12,467, while the Skechers ranks significantly higher at 989, indicating a stronger sales performance.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of each shoe is tailored to provide both functionality and style, yet they differ significantly in appearance. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a Gravel/Lilac color scheme that combines a classic look with modern elements, while the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour sports a vibrant Blue/Orange combination that stands out. The ASICS shoe includes a mesh upper that is designed for breathability and comfort, while the Skechers model also features an engineered mesh upper but incorporates synthetic overlays for added support. This attention to design helps each shoe cater to specific tastes in the running community.
Comfort Features
When it comes to comfort, both shoes excel but through different technologies. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 utilizes Rearfoot GEL technology, which provides shock absorption and cushioning, making it ideal for runners seeking impact protection. Additionally, the AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning enhances the overall softness and comfort of the ride. In contrast, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour boasts a Skechers Max Cushioning design, featuring an ULTRA LIGHT midsole that is responsive and lightweight, along with a breathable Air-Cooled Goga Mat insole for high-rebound cushioning. This gives the Skechers shoe an edge in terms of weight and immediate comfort upon wearing.
Performance and Support
Performance is crucial in running shoes, and both the ASICS and Skechers models offer support tailored to different types of runners. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is built with a molded rubber outsole that adds durability and traction for various terrains. Meanwhile, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour incorporates Natural Rocker Technology, which allows for smooth transitions from heel to toe, enhancing the running experience. This feature may be particularly beneficial for users who prioritize a seamless stride during their runs or workouts.
Maintenance and Care
Maintaining the longevity of your running shoes is important, and here, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour has a distinct advantage. It is machine washable, making it easy to keep clean and fresh for regular use. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, however, does not specify any easy-care features, which could lead to more manual upkeep over time. For active users who may encounter dirt and sweat frequently, the ease of maintenance offered by the Skechers model could be a deciding factor.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is priced at $69.95, while the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour comes in at $67.74, making it about 3% less expensive. While this price difference is relatively small, it could influence budget-conscious buyers who are looking for value without sacrificing quality. Additionally, with the Skechers model holding a higher bestseller rank, it suggests that more customers may be satisfied with their purchase, possibly justifying the slight price difference in favor of Skechers.
Customer Feedback and Popularity
Customer feedback and popularity can significantly influence buying decisions. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 has a sales rank of 12,467, indicating moderate popularity. In contrast, the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour's sales rank of 989 suggests a much stronger presence in the market, reflecting a higher level of customer satisfaction and trust. This popularity can be attributed to its innovative comfort features and appealing design, which resonate well with a larger audience.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 and the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs. If you prioritize advanced shock absorption and a classic look, the ASICS model may be the better choice. On the other hand, if you seek exceptional comfort, lightweight design, and easier maintenance, the Skechers model is a compelling option. Given the Skechers' lower price and higher sales rank, it may offer better value for those looking for a well-rounded running shoe.

