vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on aesthetics, ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on sustainability and comfort.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers better support and sustainability, making it the preferred choice for eco-conscious runners. The GT-1000 14 excels in comfort and cushioning.

Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

GT-1000 14 features FF BLAST cushioning for a cloud-like feel.

Colorway

GT-1000 14 has a brighter Winter SEA/White color.

Price

Both shoes are priced the same at $99.95.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Sustainability

GT-2000 13 uses recycled materials in its upper.

Sales Rank

GT-2000 13 has a better sales rank at 9,491.

Versatility

GT-2000 13 is engineered for various terrains.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
90

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
Price$99.95$99.95
Sales Rank185589491
Upper MaterialEngineered meshJacquard mesh
Cushioning TechFF BLASTSolution dyeing
WeightLightweightLightweight

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White

Overview

When comparing the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, both models are priced similarly at $99.95. However, each shoe has distinct features suited for different running needs. The GT-1000 14 focuses on comfort and stability, while the GT-2000 13 emphasizes support and sustainability.

Design and Aesthetics

The GT-1000 14 showcases a Winter SEA/White colorway that appeals to those who prefer a brighter look, while the GT-2000 13 comes in a classic Black/White combination, making it versatile for various outfits. Both shoes feature innovative mesh uppers, but the GT-2000 13 uses a Jacquard mesh that is not only supportive but also incorporates recycled materials, with at least 50% of its main upper material derived from recycled content. This environmentally friendly approach adds an appealing layer for eco-conscious buyers.

Comfort and Cushioning

Both shoes excel in cushioning, but they utilize different technologies. The GT-1000 14 features FF BLAST cushioning, which provides a cloud-like feel and a responsive ride—ideal for runners who prioritize comfort over long distances. In contrast, the GT-2000 13 includes a sockliner produced with a solution dyeing process that reduces water usage, contributing to a softer landing. This approach not only enhances comfort but makes it an attractive option for those looking for a lighter shoe.

Stability Features

Stability is a critical factor for runners, and both shoes incorporate ASICS' 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM. The GT-1000 14’s system offers adaptive stability through platform geometry and controlled deformation, which can be beneficial for those with a neutral gait. On the other hand, the GT-2000 13 also delivers advanced stability for a smoother stride, making it suitable for various running styles. This shared feature highlights ASICS' commitment to providing stability across its product line.

Weight and Breathability

When it comes to weight and breathability, both shoes are designed to keep runners comfortable during their workouts. The GT-1000 14's engineered mesh upper allows for breathability while minimizing the need for additional overlays. Meanwhile, the Jacquard mesh of the GT-2000 13 not only offers comfort but also helps in maintaining a lightweight feel. Given that both shoes have a similar price point, the choice may come down to personal preference regarding materials.

Performance in Various Conditions

The performance of each shoe varies slightly based on their designs. The GT-1000 14 is grounded with a durable synthetic rubber outsole, which is ideal for pavement and everyday running. In contrast, the GT-2000 13 is engineered for various terrains, offering a balance of cushioning and support that can handle different running conditions. This versatility may appeal to runners who like to mix up their routes, whether on trails or tracks.

Popularity and Sales Rank

The popularity of each shoe is reflected in their sales ranks. The GT-2000 13 holds a better position at 9,491 on the bestseller list, compared to the GT-1000 14's rank of 18,558. This difference may indicate a preference among consumers for the GT-2000 13, potentially due to its sustainable materials and overall performance. However, both models are still well-regarded in the running community, and the choice may depend on individual needs and preferences.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe comes down to personal priorities. If you value cushioning and a bright aesthetic for road running, the GT-1000 14 is an excellent choice. Conversely, if you prefer a shoe that offers sustainability and versatility across various running conditions, the GT-2000 13 may be the better option. Both shoes are priced the same at $99.95, so considering your specific needs will lead you to the right pair for your running journey.