ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on fit and support.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers a slight price advantage and dynamic cushioning, making it a strong choice for runners. However, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 excels in stability and responsiveness.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
price
ASICS is slightly more expensive at $99.95
cushioning
ASICS offers FF BLAST cushioning for responsiveness
stability
ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
price
Brooks is priced at $98.95, making it cheaper
popularity
Brooks has a higher sales rank of 1,047
cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Adrenaline GTS 24 |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST | DNA Loft v3 |
| Stability | 3D GUIDANCE | GUIDERAILS |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh | Air Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are available for $99.95, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive Running Shoe is priced slightly lower at $98.95. This makes the Brooks shoe about $1.00 or 1% cheaper than the ASICS model. While the difference is minimal, every dollar counts when purchasing running shoes, especially for regular runners. Both shoes are competitively priced within the running shoe market, but the Brooks model may appeal to those looking for a slight savings.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 features a Winter SEA/White color scheme, aiming for a trendy look that also prioritizes performance. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in a classic Black/Black/Ebony design, which offers versatility for various outfits. The ASICS shoe features an engineered mesh upper that promotes breathability, while the Brooks model boasts an engineered air mesh upper that also enhances breathability and stretch. Both designs cater to a modern aesthetic, but the choice may come down to personal preference regarding color and style.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 boasts FF BLAST cushioning, which aims to provide a cloud-like feel and a responsive ride. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, on the other hand, utilizes nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, designed to deliver a lightweight, plush comfort tailored to each runner's stride. While both shoes focus on cushioning, the Brooks may offer a more adaptive experience due to its dynamic cushioning technology. Runners seeking a more personalized comfort might lean towards the Brooks model, while those who prefer a balance of soft cushioning with responsiveness might find the ASICS shoe more appealing.
Stability Features
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 incorporates a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that provides adaptive stability for a smoother ride. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require extra support during their runs. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features the GUIDERAILS HOLISTIC SUPPORT SYSTEM, which helps to manage excess movement while supporting the natural motion path of the foot. Both models excel in providing stability, but the choice may depend on whether a runner prefers the ASICS adaptive system or the Brooks holistic approach to support.
Breathability and Temperature Control
Breathability is a key factor for runners, and both shoes are designed to promote airflow. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 uses a lightweight mesh upper that reduces the need for additional overlays, enhancing breathability. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper, which also focuses on breathability while providing a comfortable fit. Both options prioritize moisture management and ventilation, but the Brooks shoe may offer slightly better stretch and structure, which can contribute to overall comfort during longer runs.
Performance and Usage
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is designed for versatility, suitable for both pavement and everyday miles, making it a great option for various running environments. Its sales rank of 18,558 indicates a moderate popularity among consumers. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 has a significantly higher sales rank of 1,047, suggesting it is a preferred choice among runners looking for a supportive shoe. The Brooks model is also certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, making it a reliable choice for those with specific foot care needs.
Fit and Sizing
The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 comes in size 8.5, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is available in a size 9 medium. The fit of each shoe can influence a runner's performance and comfort level. The ASICS model uses a classic lace-up closure for a secure fit, while the Brooks design focuses on providing a comfortably accommodating fit through its engineered upper. Runners might find the ASICS model more suitable for a snug fit, whereas those needing a bit more room may prefer the Brooks.
Which should you buy?
In deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, the choice largely depends on individual needs and preferences. The ASICS model offers a slight edge in cushioning responsiveness and adaptive stability, making it a great choice for those who value comfort and support. Conversely, the Brooks shoe stands out with its dynamic cushioning and proven popularity, catering well to runners looking for a reliable, supportive shoe. Ultimately, both options are excellent, but the Brooks may be the better choice for those seeking a well-rounded performer with a slight price advantage.

