vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on fit and support.

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers a slight price advantage and dynamic cushioning, making it a strong choice for runners. However, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 excels in stability and responsiveness.

Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

price

ASICS is slightly more expensive at $99.95

cushioning

ASICS offers FF BLAST cushioning for responsiveness

stability

ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better

price

Brooks is priced at $98.95, making it cheaper

popularity

Brooks has a higher sales rank of 1,047

cushioning

Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
88

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGT-1000 14Adrenaline GTS 24
CushioningFF BLASTDNA Loft v3
Stability3D GUIDANCEGUIDERAILS
UpperEngineered MeshAir Mesh

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are available for $99.95, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive Running Shoe is priced slightly lower at $98.95. This makes the Brooks shoe about $1.00 or 1% cheaper than the ASICS model. While the difference is minimal, every dollar counts when purchasing running shoes, especially for regular runners. Both shoes are competitively priced within the running shoe market, but the Brooks model may appeal to those looking for a slight savings.

Design and Aesthetics

The design of the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 features a Winter SEA/White color scheme, aiming for a trendy look that also prioritizes performance. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in a classic Black/Black/Ebony design, which offers versatility for various outfits. The ASICS shoe features an engineered mesh upper that promotes breathability, while the Brooks model boasts an engineered air mesh upper that also enhances breathability and stretch. Both designs cater to a modern aesthetic, but the choice may come down to personal preference regarding color and style.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 boasts FF BLAST cushioning, which aims to provide a cloud-like feel and a responsive ride. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, on the other hand, utilizes nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, designed to deliver a lightweight, plush comfort tailored to each runner's stride. While both shoes focus on cushioning, the Brooks may offer a more adaptive experience due to its dynamic cushioning technology. Runners seeking a more personalized comfort might lean towards the Brooks model, while those who prefer a balance of soft cushioning with responsiveness might find the ASICS shoe more appealing.

Stability Features

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 incorporates a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that provides adaptive stability for a smoother ride. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require extra support during their runs. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features the GUIDERAILS HOLISTIC SUPPORT SYSTEM, which helps to manage excess movement while supporting the natural motion path of the foot. Both models excel in providing stability, but the choice may depend on whether a runner prefers the ASICS adaptive system or the Brooks holistic approach to support.

Breathability and Temperature Control

Breathability is a key factor for runners, and both shoes are designed to promote airflow. The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 uses a lightweight mesh upper that reduces the need for additional overlays, enhancing breathability. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper, which also focuses on breathability while providing a comfortable fit. Both options prioritize moisture management and ventilation, but the Brooks shoe may offer slightly better stretch and structure, which can contribute to overall comfort during longer runs.

Performance and Usage

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 is designed for versatility, suitable for both pavement and everyday miles, making it a great option for various running environments. Its sales rank of 18,558 indicates a moderate popularity among consumers. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 has a significantly higher sales rank of 1,047, suggesting it is a preferred choice among runners looking for a supportive shoe. The Brooks model is also certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, making it a reliable choice for those with specific foot care needs.

Fit and Sizing

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 comes in size 8.5, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is available in a size 9 medium. The fit of each shoe can influence a runner's performance and comfort level. The ASICS model uses a classic lace-up closure for a secure fit, while the Brooks design focuses on providing a comfortably accommodating fit through its engineered upper. Runners might find the ASICS model more suitable for a snug fit, whereas those needing a bit more room may prefer the Brooks.

Which should you buy?

In deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, the choice largely depends on individual needs and preferences. The ASICS model offers a slight edge in cushioning responsiveness and adaptive stability, making it a great choice for those who value comfort and support. Conversely, the Brooks shoe stands out with its dynamic cushioning and proven popularity, catering well to runners looking for a reliable, supportive shoe. Ultimately, both options are excellent, but the Brooks may be the better choice for those seeking a well-rounded performer with a slight price advantage.