ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated July 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on stability, Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on popularity and cushioning.
The Brooks Ghost 17 offers superior cushioning and comfort, while the ASICS GT-1000 14 excels in stability and price.
Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $10.05 cheaper than Brooks.
Stability
ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better support.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a respectable sales rank of 18,558.
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 for better comfort.
Popularity
Brooks has a best-seller rank of 61.
Breathability
Brooks features a double jacquard air mesh upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | GT-1000 14 | Ghost 17 |
| Weight | Light | Light |
| Terrain | Road | Road/Trail |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh | Jacquard Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are about 9% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe. The ASICS model is priced at $99.95, while the Brooks shoe is listed at $110.00. This difference of $10.05 might influence budget-conscious shoppers looking for reliable running shoes without compromising comfort and performance. Both shoes offer excellent features, but if price is a significant factor in your decision, the ASICS option presents a compelling case.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Ghost 17 offer appealing aesthetics, but they cater to slightly different tastes. The ASICS features a sporty silhouette with a Winter SEA/White color scheme that blends functionality with style. Conversely, the Brooks Ghost 17 showcases a more modern look with a White/Black/Rose Gold color palette, appealing to those who prefer a sleek and trendy appearance. The choice ultimately comes down to personal preference, but both models are designed to attract attention on the running track or in casual settings.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Ghost 17 stands out with its soft and dynamic cushioning. It features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which offers lightweight softness and is especially designed to provide comfort over long distances. The ASICS GT-1000 14 also prioritizes comfort with its FF BLAST cushioning, which delivers a cloud-like feel. However, the Brooks shoe is particularly noted for its ability to maintain comfort throughout the run, making it an excellent option for runners who prioritize cushioning during longer workouts.
Breathability
Breathability is a crucial aspect of running shoes, and both models excel in this area but in different ways. The Brooks Ghost 17 incorporates a double jacquard air mesh upper, ensuring optimal airflow to keep feet cool and dry. In contrast, the ASICS GT-1000 14 utilizes an engineered mesh upper, which also provides breathability while minimizing the need for additional overlays. While both shoes are designed to enhance breathability, the Brooks might have a slight edge, particularly for those who run in warmer conditions.
Stability and Support
Stability and support are where the ASICS GT-1000 14 really shines. It features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which adapts to the runner's stride to provide on-demand stability. This makes it an excellent choice for those who need extra support during their runs. The Brooks Ghost 17, while offering comfort and smooth transitions, does not emphasize stability features to the same extent. For runners who require additional support, especially over long distances, the ASICS model may be the better option.
Performance on Different Terrains
Both the ASICS GT-1000 14 and the Brooks Ghost 17 are versatile enough for various terrains, but they cater to different running styles. The ASICS is designed to provide a smooth, confident ride on pavement, while the Brooks Ghost 17 is well-suited for road running, walking, and even cross-training. If you plan to run primarily on roads, both models will perform well, but the Brooks may offer more adaptability for mixed-use scenarios due to its comfort and breathability.
Brand Reputation and Popularity
Brand reputation can influence purchasing decisions, and both ASICS and Brooks have strong followings in the running community. The ASICS GT-1000 14 has a sales rank of 18,558, indicating a respectable level of popularity, while the Brooks Ghost 17 has a much lower sales rank of 61, suggesting it is a best-seller. This popularity can be attributed to its consistent performance and comfort, making it a trusted choice for many runners. If brand reputation and sales rank are important to you, the Brooks shoe might be the preferable choice.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option with excellent stability features, the ASICS model is a strong contender at $99.95. However, if you prioritize cushioning, comfort, and a trendy aesthetic, the Brooks Ghost 17, priced at $110.00, may be worth the extra investment. Both shoes have their strengths, so your choice should reflect your running style and personal preferences.

