vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running leads on weight and comfort.

The ASICS GT-1000 14 offers advanced stability features, while the New Balance 520 V9 is a budget-friendly, lightweight option. Choose based on your specific running needs.

Why ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS is more expensive at $99.95

Stability

ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for extra support

Durability

ASICS features a synthetic rubber outsole for better grip

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better

Weight

New Balance weighs just over 200 grams

Price

New Balance is cheaper at $59.99

Popularity

New Balance has a better sales rank of 3,173

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,
75
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
ModelGT-1000 14Fresh Foam 520 V9
UpperEngineered meshBreathable mesh
CushioningFF BLASTFresh Foam
OutsoleSynthetic rubberDurable rubber
ClosureLace-upLace-up

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes, 8.5,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Overview of ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe

The ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $99.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $59.99, making it about 40% less expensive. Both shoes offer unique features tailored for running, but they cater to different preferences in terms of technology and comfort.

Design and Aesthetics

The ASICS GT-1000 14 boasts a sleek design with a Winter SEA/White color scheme, appealing to runners who value both style and performance. In contrast, the New Balance 520 V9 is available in a Black/Castlerock/Metallic Rose combination, offering a modern yet understated look. Both designs focus on functionality, but the ASICS model emphasizes a more sporty aesthetic, while the New Balance shoe leans towards a casual appeal, making it suitable for both workouts and daily wear.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, the ASICS GT-1000 14 incorporates FF BLAST cushioning, providing a cloud-like feel and responsive ride. This innovative midsole is designed to enhance stability and comfort, particularly beneficial for longer runs. On the other hand, the New Balance 520 V9 features fresh foam cushioning that offers responsive comfort mile after mile, ensuring a pleasant experience during cardio workouts. Both shoes include breathable mesh uppers, but the ASICS model's 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM provides additional stability, making it potentially a better choice for those needing extra support.

Weight and Portability

The New Balance 520 V9 is designed to be lightweight, weighing just over 200 grams, which can significantly reduce fatigue over extended runs. The ASICS GT-1000 14 does not specify its weight, but it is generally recognized as slightly heavier due to its added stability features. For runners prioritizing speed and agility, the lightweight nature of the New Balance shoe may be a decisive factor, especially for those who prefer a shoe that feels almost unnoticeable during workouts.

Traction and Durability

When it comes to traction, the ASICS GT-1000 14 features a durable synthetic rubber outsole that enhances grip on various surfaces. Meanwhile, the New Balance 520 V9 also utilizes a robust rubber outsole, designed for reliable traction during runs. Both shoes are built to last, but the ASICS model's emphasis on stability may provide an edge in terms of durability, particularly on uneven terrain, making it suitable for more challenging running environments.

Price and Value

The price difference between the two shoes is significant, with the ASICS GT-1000 14 retailing for $99.95, compared to the New Balance 520 V9's $59.99. This represents about a 40% savings when opting for the New Balance model. While the ASICS shoe may offer advanced stability features and a premium feel, the New Balance shoe provides excellent value, especially for those new to running or seeking a budget-friendly option that doesn't compromise on comfort.

Sales Rank and Popularity

In terms of market performance, the ASICS GT-1000 14 holds a sales rank of 18,558, indicating a steady level of interest among consumers. The New Balance 520 V9, however, performs significantly better with a sales rank of 3,173, suggesting that it is a more popular choice among shoppers. This popularity may reflect the New Balance shoe's combination of comfort, style, and affordability, making it an appealing option for a wider audience.

User Experience and Feedback

User feedback for the ASICS GT-1000 14 highlights its supportive features and comfort during longer runs, making it a preferred choice for serious runners. Conversely, the New Balance 520 V9 is praised for its lightweight design and versatility, ideal for both running and casual activities. Each shoe has its strengths, with the ASICS model catering more to those requiring stability, while the New Balance appeals to users seeking an all-around versatile shoe.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-1000 14 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize advanced stability features and are willing to invest a bit more at $99.95, the ASICS model may be the right choice for you. However, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option that doesn't sacrifice comfort and weighs less, the New Balance shoe at $59.99 is an excellent alternative. With the New Balance offering a more appealing price point and higher sales rank, it may be the wiser purchase for those who want a reliable running shoe without breaking the bank.