ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on fit and stability, Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on breathability.
The ASICS GT-2000 13 offers superior stability and support, while the Brooks Anthem 8 provides excellent cushioning at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Stability
ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for enhanced stability.
Cushioning
Rearfoot PureGEL technology offers lightweight cushioning.
Sustainability
At least 50% of the upper material is recycled.
Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is priced at $89.95, making it more budget-friendly.
Breathability
Lightweight performance mesh upper improves airflow.
Cushioning Upgrade
DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam provides extra cushioning.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White | Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Upper Material | Jacquard mesh | Performance mesh |
| Midsole | PureGEL | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Fit | Supportive | Secure |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is a well-rounded option for runners seeking stability and comfort. Priced at $99.95, it features advanced technology to enhance performance. Its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM aims to provide stability, making it ideal for longer runs. The shoe's jacquard mesh upper not only offers a supportive fit but is also made with at least 50% recycled content, aligning with sustainable practices. With a sales rank of 9491, this model is popular among runners looking for a reliable shoe that supports their stride.
Overview of Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe
The Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe comes in at a lower price point of $89.95, making it about 10% cheaper than the ASICS option. This shoe is designed for budget-conscious runners and beginners, offering a soft ride and breathable fit. The upgraded DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam increases cushioning, providing a comfortable experience for daily activities. With a sales rank of 4355, it is a solid choice for those looking for comfort without compromising on performance.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS GT-2000 13 features Rearfoot PureGEL technology that provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings. This technology helps to absorb impact, making it suitable for long-distance running. On the other hand, the Brooks Anthem 8 boasts a significant upgrade in cushioning with its DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam, offering 2mm more cushioning compared to its predecessor. This focus on softness and balance makes the Brooks shoe particularly appealing for casual fitness routines or everyday miles.
Fit and Breathability
The ASICS GT-2000 13 has a jacquard mesh upper designed for a supportive and comfortable foothold, which also aids in breathability. However, the Brooks Anthem 8 takes breathability a step further with its lightweight performance mesh upper that conforms to the foot shape. This design allows for improved airflow, keeping feet cool during warm-weather training. For runners in hotter climates or those who prefer a snug fit, the Brooks option may provide better ventilation.
Stability and Support
For those seeking stability, the ASICS GT-2000 13 excels with its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which offers advanced stability for a smoother stride. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who need additional support during their runs. In contrast, the Brooks Anthem 8 focuses on promoting smooth heel-to-toe transitions. Its engineered midsole geometry cradles the foot upon landing, fostering a natural motion. While both shoes offer support, the ASICS model is more tailored for stability-focused runners.
Durability and Traction
Durability is another factor where both shoes shine. The ASICS GT-2000 13 is crafted with materials aimed at long-term use, but specific durability features are not detailed. The Brooks Anthem 8, however, utilizes a RoadTack rubber outsole that enhances traction on various surfaces, making it versatile for city streets and suburban sidewalks. This focus on grip helps maintain performance and safety during runs, particularly in varying weather conditions.
Price Comparison
In terms of pricing, the ASICS GT-2000 13 is listed at $99.95, while the Brooks Anthem 8 is available for $89.95, making the latter about 10% cheaper. This price difference may be significant for budget-conscious shoppers or those just starting their running journey. Considering the features offered by both shoes, the Brooks option provides a solid performance at a lower price point, making it accessible for a wider range of runners.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 largely depends on your specific needs as a runner. If stability and advanced support are your top priorities, the ASICS model may be more suitable for you, especially with its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option that still provides comfort and a smooth ride, the Brooks Anthem 8 is a compelling choice, especially given its lower price and excellent cushioning. Ultimately, both shoes offer unique benefits, making them strong contenders in the running shoe market.

