vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated July 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on stability and eco-friendliness, Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on cushioning and price.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers better stability and is more budget-friendly, while the Brooks Women's Ghost 17 excels in cushioning and versatility.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Price

ASICS is $10 cheaper than Brooks

Eco-Friendliness

ASICS uses 50% recycled materials

Stability

ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for support

Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning

Breathability

Brooks has a double jacquard air mesh upper

Versatility

Brooks is suitable for various activities like cross-training

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
75
Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -
82

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteBrooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -
BrandASICSBrooks
Sales Rank949161
WeightLightLight
Upper MaterialJacquard MeshDouble Jacquard Air Mesh
Sustainability50% RecycledCarbon Neutral

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteBrooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe. The ASICS model is priced at $99.95, whereas the Brooks shoe retails for $110.00. This price difference could be a significant factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes. Despite the ASICS being less expensive, both shoes offer premium features that cater to different running needs.

Design and Aesthetics

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features a sleek black and white design, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 comes in a striking white, black, and rose gold colorway. The aesthetics of the ASICS may appeal to those who prefer a more understated look, whereas the Brooks' vibrant color scheme can attract fashion-forward runners. Both shoes are designed with an emphasis on comfort and style, allowing runners to feel good while performing their best.

Comfort Features

In terms of comfort, the Brooks Ghost 17 is designed with premium nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, offering a soft and dynamic feel with every step. This shoe includes extra cushioning, with one millimeter more in the heel and three millimeters in the forefoot compared to its predecessor. On the other hand, the ASICS GT-2000 13 incorporates rearfoot PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning and softer landings, making it an excellent choice for those seeking stability and support. Both shoes provide exceptional comfort, but the Brooks may have the edge for runners prioritizing softness.

Breathability and Fit

The ASICS GT-2000 13 features a jacquard mesh upper, which is designed to offer a supportive and comfortable foothold while also enhancing breathability. The Brooks Ghost 17 utilizes a double jacquard air mesh upper that not only promotes airflow but also adapts to the foot’s natural movements, providing a snug fit. This design ensures that wearers remain cool and dry during intense activities. Both shoes excel in breathability, but the Brooks may offer a more adaptive fit for various foot shapes.

Stability and Support

For runners seeking stability, the ASICS GT-2000 13 is equipped with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that provides advanced stability for a smoother stride. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who overpronate or require extra support during their runs. The Brooks Ghost 17, while primarily a neutral shoe, offers smooth transitions thanks to its newly designed midsole with precise flex grooves. This allows for natural toe-off, promoting speed and momentum. If stability is a primary concern, the ASICS may be the preferable choice.

Eco-Friendliness

Both the ASICS and Brooks shoes reflect a commitment to eco-friendliness, but in different ways. The ASICS GT-2000 13 is made with at least 50% recycled upper material and features a sockliner produced with a solution dyeing process that reduces water usage and carbon emissions. Meanwhile, the Brooks Ghost 17 is a certified carbon neutral product and is crafted with recycled materials in its rubber outsole. Eco-conscious consumers may appreciate the sustainability efforts of both brands, although the ASICS shoe specifically highlights its use of recycled content.

Performance on Different Terrains

When considering terrain, the Brooks Ghost 17 is designed for road running, walking, cross-training, and gym activities, making it a versatile choice for various workout scenarios. It offers a combination of durability and lightweight performance, ideal for everyday use. The ASICS GT-2000 13, while also suitable for running, emphasizes stability and comfort, making it particularly well-suited for long-distance runs on paved surfaces. For those who frequently switch between different types of workouts, the Brooks may offer greater versatility.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 ultimately comes down to personal preferences and specific running needs. If you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that excels in stability and eco-friendliness, the ASICS GT-2000 13 is an excellent choice at $99.95. However, if you prioritize cushioning, breathability, and versatility for various workouts, the Brooks Ghost 17, priced at $110.00, might be worth the extra investment. Both shoes are highly rated, with the Brooks being a bestseller at rank 61, while the ASICS holds a respectable rank of 9491, ensuring that either choice will deliver quality performance.