vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on cushioning and fit.

The ASICS GT-2000 13 offers better value and eco-friendliness, while the Brooks Glycerin 23 excels in cushioning and comfort.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Price

ASICS is $60 cheaper than Brooks

Eco-friendliness

ASICS uses recycled materials

Stability

ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for support

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning

Design

Brooks has a more vibrant and modern aesthetic

Comfort

Brooks offers a plush, engineered upper for extended wear

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
75
Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteBrooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Upper MaterialJacquard meshTriple jacquard knit
WeightLightweightModerate
SustainabilityYesNo
FitSupportivePlush
UsageVersatileLong runs
Color OptionsBlack/WhiteWhite/Pink

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteBrooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, which retails for $159.99. This significant price difference may influence budget-conscious shoppers, especially those who are looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. While both shoes are designed for performance, the cost disparity could be a critical factor for runners who prioritize value for money alongside functionality.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the ASICS GT-2000 13 showcases a sleek black and white color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a classic look. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin 23 features a more vibrant combination of white, phantom, and cyber pink, which might attract runners who enjoy a pop of color in their footwear. The design choices reflect the brands' philosophies, with ASICS focusing on a minimalist aesthetic and Brooks aiming for a modern, eye-catching style that stands out on the track or trail.

Upper Material and Comfort

The ASICS GT-2000 13 incorporates a jacquard mesh upper that offers a supportive and comfortable fit, while also being environmentally conscious, as at least 50% of its upper material is made with recycled content. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin 23 boasts an engineered upper that features a triple jacquard warp-knit design, delivering a plush, comfortable fit. This unique construction reduces pressure points and hot spots during long runs, making it ideal for extensive wear. Both shoes emphasize comfort, but the Brooks model focuses more on a luxurious feel.

Cushioning Technology

Cushioning is where these two models start to diverge significantly. The ASICS GT-2000 13 utilizes rearfoot PureGEL technology, which provides lightweight cushioning and supports softer landings. The shoe also features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for enhanced stability. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is equipped with upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole cushioning, which offers 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot compared to its predecessor. This results in softer landings and more responsive toe-offs, making the Glycerin an excellent choice for runners who prioritize plush cushioning during their runs.

Stability Features

In terms of stability, the ASICS GT-2000 13 is designed with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that promotes a smoother stride. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require additional support during their movement. The Brooks Glycerin 23, while being a neutral shoe, is designed for smooth and stable transitions, featuring a wide platform that enhances balance and promotes seamless heel-to-toe transitions. Each shoe has its own approach to stability, catering to different types of runners—those needing extra support versus those who value fluid movement.

Performance and Usage

The ASICS GT-2000 13 is marketed as a versatile running shoe suitable for various activities, including daily training and long-distance runs. Its sales rank of 9,491 indicates a solid presence in the market, appealing to a wide range of runners. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is tailored for neutral runners seeking premium comfort and smooth performance, making it ideal for long runs, daily training, or recovery days. Its higher sales rank of 4,982 suggests it is favored among those who prioritize comfort and performance on longer distances.

Environmental Considerations

Sustainability is an essential factor for many consumers today, and the ASICS GT-2000 13 stands out with its commitment to the environment. The use of recycled content in its upper material and the solution dyeing process, which reduces water usage and carbon emissions, demonstrates a clear effort towards eco-friendliness. While the Brooks Glycerin 23 does not explicitly mention sustainable materials, it emphasizes performance and comfort over environmental impact. For eco-conscious consumers, the ASICS model may be the more appealing option.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a more budget-friendly option with a focus on stability and an environmentally conscious design, the ASICS GT-2000 13 is a compelling choice at $99.95. However, if you prioritize plush cushioning and a modern aesthetic for long-distance running, the Brooks Glycerin 23, despite its higher price of $159.99, may be worth the investment. Evaluate your running style, budget, and aesthetic preference before making a decision.