ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on comfort and support, New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker wins on eco-friendliness.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is better for serious runners, while the New Balance 574 is a stylish, budget-friendly option for casual wear.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Performance
ASICS is designed for serious running.
Technology
Advanced cushioning features in ASICS.
Sustainability
ASICS uses more recycled materials.
Why New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker is better
Price
New Balance is approximately 25% cheaper.
Style
New Balance offers a classic sneaker design.
Versatility
New Balance is suitable for casual wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White | New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Material | Jacquard mesh | Suede/mesh |
| Cushioning | PureGEL | ENCAP |
| Recycled Content | 50% | 5% |
| Fit | Advanced stability | Adjustable lace |
| Use Case | Running | Casual |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, while the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker is significantly cheaper at $74.95, making it about 25% less expensive. This difference of $25 may influence buyers who are budget-conscious or looking for value without compromising quality. Both shoes are well-reviewed, but the price gap suggests that New Balance offers a more accessible option for those who want a stylish sneaker without breaking the bank.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features a sleek black and white design with a jacquard mesh upper that enhances both support and comfort. In contrast, the New Balance Women's 574 boasts a classic silhouette with a suede and mesh upper, appealing to those who prefer a timeless sneaker style. While both shoes excel in aesthetics, the choice ultimately comes down to personal preference regarding modern versus classic designs.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is designed with advanced features such as a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which provide a smoother stride and lightweight cushioning. The New Balance Women's 574, on the other hand, employs an ENCAP midsole cushioning system that combines soft foam with a durable polyurethane rim for all-day support. Both shoes offer excellent comfort, but ASICS may appeal more to serious runners with its specialized cushioning technology.
Sustainability
Sustainability is a key consideration for many consumers today. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 uses at least 50% recycled materials in its upper construction and features a sockliner produced with a solution dyeing process that reduces water and carbon emissions. The New Balance Women's 574 also incorporates eco-friendly elements, such as an EVA midsole foam made from approximately 3% bio-based content and a rubber outsole containing 5% recycled rubber. While both brands are making strides towards sustainability, ASICS has a more substantial commitment to reducing its environmental impact.
Performance and Use
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is particularly suited for running, thanks to its stability features and lightweight cushioning. With a sales rank of 9,491, it’s a popular choice among runners looking for a reliable shoe. The New Balance Women's 574, with a sales rank of 1,005, is more versatile and can be worn for casual outings or light exercise rather than high-performance activities. Thus, if you’re looking for a dedicated running shoe, ASICS is the better choice, while New Balance serves well for everyday wear.
Durability
Durability is essential for footwear, especially for those who intend to wear them often. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is designed to withstand the rigors of running, while the New Balance Women's 574 is built with a rubber outsole that contains recycled rubber for enhanced longevity. Although both shoes promise durability, the performance-oriented features of ASICS suggest it may hold up better under the demands of regular running compared to the more casual-focused New Balance sneaker.
Brand Reputation
Both ASICS and New Balance have strong reputations in the athletic footwear market. ASICS is particularly known for its high-performance running shoes, while New Balance has carved a niche for itself in lifestyle and casual sneakers. This distinction is reflected in their respective bestseller ranks, with New Balance performing better overall. However, ASICS's focus on performance gives it an edge among serious athletes looking for specialized footwear.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe and the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker ultimately hinges on your specific needs. If you are a serious runner looking for advanced technology and support, the ASICS shoe, despite its higher price, is likely the best choice. However, if you seek a comfortable, stylish sneaker for everyday wear at a lower price, the New Balance option is approximately 25% cheaper and offers timeless appeal. Consider your lifestyle and what you'll primarily use the shoes for to make the best decision.

