vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium vs New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker

Updated June 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium leads on performance & cushioning and use case & intended audience.

The Brooks Ghost 17 is superior for runners and walkers seeking performance, comfort, and medical certifications, while the New Balance 574 Core offers a budget-friendly option for casual wear with basic eco-friendly features.

Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium is better

Performance & Cushioning

Ghost 17 uses nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 foam with 1mm extra heel and 3mm extra forefoot cushioning vs. 574 Core's standard EVA foam

Durability & Materials

Ghost 17 has recycled silica in outsole and is carbon neutral with APMA Seal; 574 Core has only 5% recycled rubber and 3% bio-based EVA

Use Case & Intended Audience

Ghost 17 is certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and APMA-approved for foot health; 574 Core lacks medical certifications

Why New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker is better

Price

574 Core costs $74.95 vs. Ghost 17's $110.00, making it 32% cheaper

Bestseller Rank

574 Core has bestseller rank of 1,005 vs. Ghost 17's top-ranked 61, indicating broader casual appeal

Style & Versatility

574 Core is marketed as a lifestyle sneaker with suede/mesh upper, ideal for casual wear and travel

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium
88
New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker
62

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 MediumNew Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker
Price$110.00$74.95
Midsole TechnologyNitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 foam with added cushioningEVA foam with 3% bio-based content
Outsole MaterialRecycled silica for durability and rebound5% recycled rubber
Foot Health CertificationsPDAC A5500 Diabetic Shoe, APMA Seal of AcceptanceNone
Environmental CertificationCertified carbon neutralNo certification, only material content claims
Primary Use CaseRunning, walking, cross-training, gymCasual wear, travel, lifestyle

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 MediumNew Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker

Price Comparison: Brooks Ghost 17 vs. New Balance 574 Core

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is about 32% more expensive than the New Balance Women’s 574 Core, priced at $110.00 versus $74.95. This $35.05 price difference represents a significant cost gap for consumers seeking value. While the Ghost 17 carries a higher sticker price, it comes with performance-oriented materials and certifications not found in the 574 Core. The 574 Core offers a lower entry point for casual wearers or those on a tighter budget, making it an attractive option for everyday use without premium running features.

Performance & Cushioning: Running-Grade vs. Lifestyle Comfort

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 delivers superior cushioning designed for running, featuring nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 foam with an extra 1mm in the heel and 3mm in the forefoot compared to its predecessor. This advanced midsole provides softness and responsiveness ideal for road running, walking, and cross-training. In contrast, the New Balance Women’s 574 Core uses EVA midsole foam with approximately 3% bio-based content, offering basic all-day support but lacking the specialized cushioning required for sustained physical activity. The Ghost 17’s focus on dynamic comfort and impact absorption makes it far better suited for active users, while the 574 Core prioritizes general comfort over athletic performance.

Fit & Upper Construction: Precision Support vs. Casual Flexibility

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 features a double jacquard air mesh upper that enhances breathability and adapts to natural foot movement, paired with a kick-back collar for added structure and support. This design ensures a snug, secure fit during high-intensity activities. The New Balance Women’s 574 Core uses a suede/mesh combination upper with adjustable lace closure, which allows for a customizable fit but lacks the engineered breathability and adaptive properties of the Ghost 17’s mesh system. The Ghost 17’s construction supports dynamic motion, while the 574 Core’s upper remains more focused on aesthetic appeal and simple adjustability.

Durability & Materials: Sustainable Innovation vs. Basic Longevity

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 incorporates recycled silica in its rubber outsole, enhancing durability and providing responsive rebound across varied terrains. Additionally, the shoe is certified carbon neutral and holds the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating medical endorsement for foot health. The New Balance Women’s 574 Core also includes eco-conscious elements, with a rubber outsole containing 5% recycled rubber and EVA foam made with 3% renewable sources. However, these sustainability efforts are less comprehensive than those in the Ghost 17, which includes both material innovation and broader environmental certification. The Ghost 17 clearly outpaces the 574 Core in sustainable manufacturing depth.

Use Case & Intended Audience: Dedicated Runner vs. Everyday Casual

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is explicitly designed for runners and walkers seeking a reliable, everyday companion with smooth transitions and consistent comfort. It is certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and carries the APMA Seal, affirming its suitability for individuals with specific foot health needs. The New Balance Women’s 574 Core, by contrast, is marketed as a lifestyle sneaker—ideal for casual wear, travel, and light daily use. Its lack of medical certifications and running-specific features limits its functionality for serious athletes. The Ghost 17 targets performance-driven users; the 574 Core appeals to those prioritizing style and simplicity.

Bestseller Rank & Market Positioning: High Demand vs. Steady Presence

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 holds a bestseller rank of 61, indicating strong consumer demand and popularity within the running shoe category. This high ranking reflects its reputation for quality, comfort, and reliability among active users. The New Balance Women’s 574 Core has a bestseller rank of 1,005, suggesting steady but less intense market traction. While still visible in search results, it doesn’t command the same level of attention as the Ghost 17. The Ghost 17’s top-tier ranking underscores its status as a trusted choice for runners, whereas the 574 Core maintains a more niche presence as a classic lifestyle staple.

Which should you buy?

Choose the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 if you prioritize performance, durability, and foot health—especially if you run, walk regularly, or need diabetic-safe footwear. At $110.00, it offers certified comfort, advanced cushioning, and sustainability features that justify its higher price. Opt for the New Balance Women’s 574 Core if you want a budget-friendly, stylish sneaker for casual use—$74.95 makes it about 32% cheaper, and its eco-friendly materials suit low-impact lifestyles. For dedicated runners or walkers, the Ghost 17 is the clear winner. For everyday wear without athletic demands, the 574 Core delivers value.