ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on comfort and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX wins on style.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers superior stability and advanced technology, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 is a more budget-friendly and stylish option.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Price
ASICS is more expensive but offers advanced features.
Technology
ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for stability.
Sustainability
ASICS uses recycled materials in its construction.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Weight
New Balance is designed for a lightweight ride.
Style
New Balance offers a more vibrant color scheme.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Upper Material | Jacquard mesh | Mesh |
| Cushioning | PureGEL | Fresh Foam |
| Outsole | Durable rubber | Durable rubber |
| Fit | Secure fit | Sleek fit |
Dimension comparison
Brand Overview
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX Running Shoe come from two respected brands in the athletic footwear market. ASICS is known for its commitment to performance and support, while New Balance emphasizes comfort and style in their designs. Both brands have a strong following, but their approaches to running shoes differ significantly. ASICS, with a bestseller rank of 9491, showcases its focus on stability and advanced technology, whereas New Balance, ranked 32236, leans towards a more casual and lightweight running experience.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is priced at $99.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 is priced at $68.00. This indicates that the ASICS shoe is about 47% more expensive than the New Balance option. Shoppers looking for a budget-friendly choice may find the New Balance model more appealing, especially considering its lower price point and the fact that it still offers essential features for runners. However, the ASICS shoe may justify its higher price with advanced technologies aimed at enhancing performance.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features a jacquard mesh upper designed to provide a supportive and comfortable foothold. Additionally, it incorporates a rearfoot PureGEL technology, which aids in cushioning and delivers softer landings. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 boasts a Fresh Foam midsole that is precision engineered for an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride. Both shoes aim to deliver comfort, but the ASICS model focuses more on stability and support, while the New Balance emphasizes lightweight cushioning.
Technology and Features
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is equipped with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM to enhance stability during the run, which may appeal to runners seeking a more controlled experience. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 features a breathable mesh upper with no-sew overlays, promoting a sleek fit. While both shoes utilize innovative materials for their uppers, the technology in the ASICS shoe is more advanced, primarily targeting runners who require extra stability and support.
Sustainability Efforts
Sustainability is becoming increasingly important to consumers, and both brands have taken steps in this direction. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 incorporates at least 50% recycled content in its main upper material, which helps reduce waste and carbon emissions. Additionally, the sockliner in this shoe is produced using a dyeing process that significantly cuts down on water usage and carbon emissions. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 does not mention specific sustainable practices, which may be a deciding factor for environmentally conscious consumers.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is characterized by a classic black and white color scheme, offering a timeless look that can match various running outfits. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 comes in a more vibrant color combination of Pink Salt and Rosewood, appealing to those who prefer a more stylish and modern look. Both shoes are designed to be functional, but the choice of aesthetics may cater to different personal styles.
Performance and Usage
For performance, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is geared towards runners seeking stability and support, making it suitable for longer distances or those who require extra cushioning. Its sales rank of 9491 indicates that it is well-regarded among runners. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 is designed for a versatile running experience, suitable for shorter runs or casual wear, as evidenced by its lower sales rank of 32236. The performance differences may lead consumers to choose based on their specific running needs.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 depends on your priorities as a runner. If you value advanced technology for stability and support, the ASICS shoe may be the better choice. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers comfort, the New Balance shoe is an appealing alternative. Ultimately, consider your running style, the type of terrain you'll cover, and your aesthetic preferences when making your decision.

