vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX

Updated July 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive wins on price and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX wins on weight.

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 is a more affordable, lightweight option for casual use.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive is better

Cushioning

Brooks features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning.

Support

Brooks includes a GuideRails support system for stability.

Sales Rank

Brooks has a significantly better sales rank at 459.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX is better

Price

New Balance is priced at $68.00, making it more affordable.

Weight

New Balance is lighter, focusing on a more casual design.

Sleek Design

New Balance features a no-sew overlay for a sleek look.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX
65

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 SupportiveNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX
BrandBrooksNew Balance
ModelAdrenaline GTS 25Fresh Foam Arishi v4
Sales Rank45932236
Cushion TypeDNA LOFT v3Fresh Foam
Support SystemGuideRailsNone

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 SupportiveNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX

Overview of the Products

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is designed for runners and walkers seeking reliable support and cushioning, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX offers a more lightweight and versatile option. Priced at $132.99, the Brooks shoe is about 96% more expensive than the New Balance, which retails for $68.00. This significant price difference reflects the Brooks shoe's advanced support features and cushioning technology aimed at enhancing comfort over longer distances.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort and cushioning, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 stands out with its premium nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, which provides a soft and dynamic feel. This shoe features a total of 3 mm of added cushioning in the forefoot, enhancing responsiveness and comfort for mile after mile. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 utilizes a Fresh Foam midsole that delivers an ultra-cushioned ride but lacks the advanced support systems present in the Brooks model. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Brooks shoe's added features cater more specifically to those who require extra support during their runs.

Support System

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 incorporates a unique GuideRails holistic support system, which helps manage excess movement from heel to knee. This technology is particularly beneficial for runners who may have issues with stability. The Adrenaline GTS 25 is also PDAC A5500 Approved, indicating it meets certain medical standards for diabetic footwear. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 does not highlight any specific support technologies, focusing more on a lightweight design and comfort. For runners who prioritize stability and support, the Brooks shoe is clearly the superior choice.

Fit and Design

In terms of fit and design, both shoes offer features that enhance comfort. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 comes with a breathable engineered mesh upper and a flat-knit collar, ensuring a secure and flexible fit. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 features a mesh upper with no-sew overlays for a sleek look and feel. Although both shoes are designed for comfort, the Brooks shoe's structured fit gives it an edge for active users seeking additional support during their activities.

Durability and Outsole Quality

The durability of running shoes is essential for long-term performance. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features a rubber outsole designed to promote smooth transitions and enhanced traction, making it suitable for various running conditions. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 also includes a durable rubber outsole, but it does not offer the same level of advanced design aimed at improving transitions. While both shoes are built for durability, the Brooks shoe's emphasis on seamless transitions may provide better long-term value for serious runners.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two models is substantial, with the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 priced at $132.99 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 at $68.00. This makes the New Balance shoe approximately 49% cheaper than the Brooks shoe. While the lower price may be appealing, it’s essential to consider what features you are sacrificing by choosing the less expensive option. The Brooks shoe offers advanced support and cushioning that may justify its higher price for serious runners.

Sales Ranking and Market Position

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 has a sales rank of 459, indicating a solid market presence and popularity among consumers. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 has a higher sales rank of 32,236, suggesting it may not be as favored by buyers in the competitive running shoe market. The Brooks shoe’s better ranking can be attributed to its targeted features that cater to runners looking for support and comfort, whereas the New Balance shoe may appeal more to casual users seeking a budget-friendly option.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize advanced support, superior cushioning, and a structured fit for serious running, the Brooks shoe is worth the investment despite its higher price tag. However, if you are looking for a more affordable, lightweight option for casual walks or runs, the New Balance shoe may be a better fit for your lifestyle. Each shoe serves a different purpose, making it essential to consider how you intend to use them before making your decision.