vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on sustainability and price, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running wins on weight and comfort.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers better value and stability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 excels in cushioning and weight.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Price

ASICS is $60 cheaper

Sustainability

ASICS uses recycled materials

Stability

ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running is better

Cushioning

Fresh Foam X provides superior comfort

Weight

New Balance is lighter at 241 grams

Design

New Balance has a vibrant color scheme

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
Current Price$99.95$159.95
Sales Rank949125188
WeightN/A241g
CushioningPureGELFresh Foam X

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running Shoe, which retails for $159.95. This price difference can be significant for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes. The ASICS model offers a more accessible entry point for those who want performance without breaking the bank, while the New Balance shoe, being more expensive, may appeal to those seeking premium features and comfort.

Comfort and Fit

When it comes to comfort, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 Running Shoe shines with its Fresh Foam X midsole, designed to deliver an incredibly cushioned experience. This running shoe weighs only 241 grams (8.5 oz), which suggests that it will be light on your feet, enhancing your running experience. In contrast, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features a sockliner produced with a solution dyeing process that provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Fresh Foam X technology gives New Balance a distinct edge in terms of overall cushioning.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is available in a sleek Black/White color scheme, which appeals to those who prefer a classic look. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 comes in a more vibrant Sea Salt/Lab Green/Frosted Glass combination, offering a contemporary aesthetic that may attract younger runners or those looking for a pop of color in their footwear. Both designs are stylish, but your choice would depend on personal preference regarding color and style.

Sustainability Features

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 emphasizes sustainability by incorporating recycled materials in at least 50% of its main upper, helping to reduce waste and carbon emissions. Additionally, the sockliner manufacturing process reduces water usage by approximately 33% and carbon emissions by about 45%. This commitment to sustainability may resonate with environmentally conscious consumers. Conversely, the New Balance shoe does not highlight any similar sustainable practices, which may influence buyers who prioritize eco-friendly products.

Performance on Different Surfaces

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is designed with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that provides advanced stability for a smoother stride, making it suitable for various surfaces. This feature is beneficial for runners who might encounter different terrains. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 focuses on comfort and lightweight performance, making it ideal for road running and casual use. While both shoes perform well, the ASICS model’s stability features may appeal more to serious runners who require additional support.

Weight Considerations

Weight plays a crucial role in running shoe choice, and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 is notably lighter at 241 grams (8.5 oz) compared to the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13, although the specific weight for the ASICS model isn't provided. The lighter weight of the New Balance shoe can contribute to a more effortless running experience, especially over long distances. Runners who prioritize speed and agility may find the New Balance model better suited to their needs.

Sales and Popularity

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 holds a sales rank of 9,491, indicating a strong popularity among buyers. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 has a sales rank of 25,188, which suggests it may not be selling as briskly. This difference in popularity could impact your decision, as a bestseller often indicates higher consumer satisfaction and trust in performance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X More V6 ultimately depends on your priorities. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that incorporates sustainable practices and offers stability, the ASICS model is a compelling choice. However, if your emphasis lies on superior cushioning, lighter weight, and modern aesthetics, the New Balance shoe may be worth the higher price. Each shoe has its strengths, catering to different types of runners and styles.