vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on price and support, Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova wins on weight and style.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers superior support and stability for serious runners, while the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour provides excellent comfort at a lower price.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Support

ASICS features advanced stability technologies.

Durability

ASICS uses premium materials for longevity.

Performance

ASICS is better suited for serious runners.

Why Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova is better

Price

Skechers is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Skechers is lighter and easier to wear.

Style

Skechers offers a bolder color scheme.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
85
Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteSkechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova
BrandASICSSkechers
ModelGT-2000 13Max Cushioning Endeavour
UpperJacquard MeshEngineered Mesh
CushioningPureGELAir-Cooled Goga Mat
FitStandardWide

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/WhiteSkechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, whereas the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova Sneaker is about 17% cheaper at $67.74. This significant price difference makes the Skechers a more budget-friendly option for consumers looking to save while still getting quality footwear. The ASICS shoe is positioned in the mid to high range of running shoes, reflecting its advanced features and technology. In contrast, Skechers offers a value-driven approach without compromising on comfort, making it appealing for those who prioritize affordability.

Comfort and Support

Both shoes are designed for comfort, but they achieve this through different technologies. The ASICS GT-2000 13 features a jacquard mesh upper that provides a supportive foothold and is made from at least 50% recycled content. It incorporates a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM and Rearfoot PureGEL technology for enhanced stability and cushioning. On the other hand, the Skechers Max Cushioning Endeavour uses ULTRA LIGHT midsole cushioning and an Air-Cooled Goga Mat insole for high-rebound comfort. While ASICS focuses on stability and support, Skechers emphasizes lightweight cushioning and breathability, appealing to different types of runners.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ASICS shoe comes in a classic black and white color scheme, which is versatile and suitable for various outfits. The sleek design is complemented by technical elements that enhance performance. Conversely, the Skechers sneaker sports a more vibrant blue and orange color combination, catering to those who prefer a bolder look. The engineered mesh upper of the Skechers also contributes to its modern aesthetic, making it not just functional but also stylish. Ultimately, the choice between these two will depend on personal style preferences, as both brands offer visually appealing options.

Performance in Running

When it comes to running performance, the ASICS GT-2000 13 is designed with features that support serious runners. Its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM enhances stability, making it suitable for longer runs and varied terrains. The Rearfoot PureGEL technology also promises a softer landing, which can be particularly beneficial for runners who experience joint strain. In comparison, the Skechers Max Cushioning Endeavour, with its Natural Rocker Technology, facilitates smooth heel-to-toe transitions. While both shoes perform well, the ASICS may be better suited for dedicated runners seeking advanced support, while the Skechers is ideal for casual runners or those focused on comfort during shorter distances.

Breathability and Durability

The breathability of a shoe is crucial for comfort, especially during intense workouts. The ASICS shoe features a jacquard mesh upper that allows for good airflow, essential for temperature regulation during runs. This design also incorporates recycled materials, contributing to a more sustainable choice. The Skechers sneaker takes breathability a step further with its engineered mesh upper, ensuring maximum ventilation and comfort. However, durability is also a factor; both brands are known for their reliable construction, but the ASICS shoe's premium materials might offer a slight edge in longevity, making it a better investment for regular runners.

Weight and Fit

Weight can significantly affect running performance, and here the Skechers has an advantage. The ASICS GT-2000 13 is designed for stability, which can add a bit of weight, while the Skechers Max Cushioning Endeavour is lightweight, making it easier to wear for extended periods. The Skechers is available in a wide fit, catering to those who need extra room, whereas the ASICS is more standard in its sizing. For individuals with wider feet or those who prioritize a light, airy feel, the Skechers may be the more comfortable choice.

Brand Reputation and Customer Satisfaction

ASICS and Skechers both have strong reputations in the footwear market. The ASICS GT-2000 13 has a bestseller rank of 9491, indicating its popularity among serious runners who value quality and performance. Skechers, with a significantly better bestseller rank of 989, shows that its Max Cushioning Endeavour resonates well with a broader audience, particularly those looking for casual comfort and style. Customer satisfaction is generally high for both brands; however, the choice may ultimately come down to personal needs regarding performance versus everyday usability.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 and the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova comes down to your specific needs as a runner or casual wearer. If you prioritize advanced support and stability for serious running, the ASICS shoe, despite its higher price of $99.95, may be worth the investment. Conversely, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option that offers excellent comfort and style for casual wear or light running, the Skechers, priced at $67.74, is an exceptional choice. Ultimately, both shoes have their merits, and the best option will depend on your personal preferences and intended use.