ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White vs WHITIN Women's Zero Drop Wide Width Toe Box Road
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on comfort and stability, WHITIN Women's Zero Drop Wide Width Toe Box Road wins on breathability and weight.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers advanced technology and brand reputation, while the WHITIN provides a budget-friendly option with unique features. Choose based on your priorities.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Brand Reputation
ASICS has a higher bestseller rank.
Performance Features
ASICS includes advanced cushioning technology.
Design
ASICS has a sleek and modern aesthetic.
Why WHITIN Women's Zero Drop Wide Width Toe Box Road is better
Price
WHITIN is significantly cheaper.
Comfort
WHITIN features a zero-drop heel for natural movement.
Breathability
WHITIN has a moisture-wicking lining.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White | WHITIN Women's Zero Drop Wide Width Toe Box Road |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | WHITIN |
| Price | $99.95 | $49.99 |
| Bestseller Rank | 9491 | 21998 |
| Cushioning | PureGEL | Standard |
| Toe Box | Standard | Wide |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, whereas the WHITIN Women's Zero Drop Wide Width Toe Box Road Running Shoes come in at $49.99. This means that the ASICS model is about 100% more expensive than the WHITIN, making it a significant investment for buyers. If budget is a primary concern, the WHITIN offers a more economical choice, costing approximately $49.96 less than its competitor. While the price difference is substantial, potential buyers should consider what features they are looking for in a running shoe.
Brand Reputation
ASICS is a well-established brand in the running shoe market, boasting a bestseller rank of 9491, indicating its popularity among consumers. The company is known for its technology-driven designs and commitment to quality. On the other hand, WHITIN, while less recognized, offers unique features tailored for comfort and stability. Its bestseller rank of 21998 suggests a smaller but dedicated customer base. Those who prioritize brand recognition may lean towards ASICS, while those open to exploring less mainstream options might find WHITIN's offerings appealing.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features a sleek design with a jacquard mesh upper in a classic black and white color scheme. This aesthetic not only looks modern but also provides a supportive and comfortable foothold. In contrast, the WHITIN Women's Zero Drop shoes come in a vibrant purple, appealing to those who prefer a pop of color in their athletic wear. The anatomical wide toe box of the WHITIN is designed for natural toe movement, while the ASICS shoe focuses on a more traditional fit. Buyers should consider which design elements align more with their personal style and functional needs.
Comfort and Fit
The comfort level of the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is enhanced by its rearfoot PureGEL technology, which provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings. Additionally, the shoe's 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM offers advanced stability, making it suitable for runners seeking extra support. Conversely, the WHITIN Women's Zero Drop model features a non-elevated "zero-drop" heel that promotes better posture and balance, which could be ideal for those who prefer a more natural running experience. Both shoes aim to provide comfort, but their approaches cater to different preferences regarding fit and feel.
Performance Features
For performance-oriented runners, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers a range of advanced features, including a sockliner produced through a solution dyeing process that reduces water usage and carbon emissions. This shoe also integrates a supportive jacquard mesh upper for stability during runs. In comparison, the WHITIN model focuses on a grippy-rubber outsole that combines grip, traction, and durability, making it suitable for various activities beyond running, such as walking and workouts. Depending on your specific performance needs, one shoe may stand out over the other.
Breathability
Breathability is an essential factor in running shoes, especially for long-distance runners. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 includes a jacquard mesh upper that is designed to allow airflow, keeping your feet cooler and more comfortable during runs. The WHITIN Women's Zero Drop shoe features a moisture-wicking mesh lining, which also aids in breathability and helps maintain a drier foot environment. Both shoes have attributes that enhance breathability, but the choice may hinge on personal preference for upper material and design.
Weight
While specific weight details are not provided, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is designed to be lightweight due to its advanced materials and cushioning technologies, making it suitable for runners who prioritize speed. The WHITIN Women's Zero Drop shoes, built for comfort and stability, may be slightly heavier due to their anatomical design and extra padding. Runners looking for a lightweight option may favor the ASICS, while those seeking comfort and stability might prefer the WHITIN, even if it comes at a slight weight penalty.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe and the WHITIN Women's Zero Drop Wide Width Toe Box Road Running Shoes ultimately depends on your personal preferences and priorities. If you are willing to invest significantly more for advanced technology, brand reputation, and a traditional running shoe experience, the ASICS model is an excellent choice. However, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option that offers comfort, a unique design, and features like a zero-drop heel, the WHITIN may be the better fit at nearly half the price. Each shoe has its distinct merits, catering to different types of runners and their needs.

