vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, wins on comfort and support, New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker wins on weight.

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 excels in performance and technology, while the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker offers great style and comfort at a lower price.

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better

Performance

ASICS has advanced running technology.

Comfort

ASICS features specialized cushioning.

Durability

ASICS is built for rigorous running conditions.

Why New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker is better

Price

New Balance is significantly cheaper.

Style

New Balance offers a classic sneaker look.

Versatility

New Balance is suitable for casual wear.

Overall score

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,
85
New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker
70

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker
BrandASICSNew Balance
Sales Rank134521005
Upper MaterialWoven meshSuede/mesh
MidsoleFF BLAST MAXENCAP
OutsoleSynthetic rubberRubber with recycled content

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5,New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $139.95, while the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker is significantly cheaper at $74.95, making it about 46% less expensive. This substantial price difference may influence buyers on a budget or those seeking value in their footwear investments. The ASICS model, known for its advanced running technology, justifies its higher price point, but the New Balance sneaker still offers excellent quality at a more accessible price.

Comfort and Fit

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a trampoline-inspired outsole pod and FF BLAST MAX cushioning that promotes a soft landing and energized toe-off. This design aims to provide an optimal running experience, especially for long-distance runners. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker includes an ENCAP midsole cushioning that combines soft foam with a durable polyurethane rim, delivering all-day support. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS model offers specialized running features that might appeal to serious athletes, whereas the New Balance focuses on casual wear and everyday comfort.

Design and Aesthetics

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 showcases a woven mesh upper in a striking twilight blue and white color scheme, making it visually appealing for runners. Its design is tailored towards performance, emphasizing breathability and a snug fit. Conversely, the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker features a classic look with a suede and mesh upper, appealing to those who appreciate a timeless sneaker style. The aesthetic choices reflect the intended use: the ASICS for running and the New Balance for casual wear, making each attractive to its target audience.

Brand Reputation

ASICS holds a strong reputation in the running community, often recognized for its technological advancements and focus on performance. With a bestseller rank of 13,452, the GT-2000 14 is a popular choice among serious runners looking for reliable footwear. In comparison, the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker boasts a higher bestseller rank of 1,005, indicating its popularity in the lifestyle sneaker market. Both brands have loyal followings, but their focus areas differ, with ASICS leaning toward performance and New Balance emphasizing casual style.

Performance Features

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 includes a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that provides adaptive stability, which is crucial for runners who need support during their stride. Additionally, the rearfoot PureGEL technology offers enhanced cushioning, making it a top choice for those prioritizing performance. The New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker, while not specifically designed for high-performance running, uses EVA Midsole foam with about 3% bio-based content, indicating a commitment to sustainability. The 574 is better suited for everyday wear rather than intense physical activity, showcasing the distinct performance focuses of each shoe.

Durability and Construction

Durability is a key consideration in footwear, especially for athletic shoes. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 is constructed with materials designed to withstand rigorous running conditions, including a synthetic rubber outsole for traction and durability. The New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker features a rubber outsole that contains 5% recycled rubber, emphasizing its sustainable construction. While both shoes are built to last, the ASICS model is engineered more specifically for running durability, while the New Balance offers durability suited for casual wear.

User Reviews and Feedback

User feedback often highlights the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 for its superior comfort and performance metrics, particularly among runners who appreciate its responsive design. However, some users note that its price may be a barrier for casual users. The New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker receives praise for its stylish look and all-day comfort, making it a favorite among those who value aesthetics and versatility. The differing focuses of these user reviews align with the intended purpose of each shoe, appealing to distinct customer segments.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are a serious runner seeking advanced technology and performance features, the ASICS model, despite its higher price of $139.95, may be worth the investment. However, if you prefer a stylish everyday sneaker that is budget-friendly at $74.95, the New Balance model could be the better choice. Each shoe excels in its own domain, catering to different lifestyles and preferences.