ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, wins on comfort and cushioning, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running wins on weight.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers advanced features for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is a budget-friendly option for casual wear.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better
Price
ASICS is more advanced but higher priced.
Performance
ASICS has superior shock absorption.
Durability
ASICS designed for varied terrains.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better
Weight
New Balance is lighter at just over 200 grams.
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Versatility
New Balance suitable for casual wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | FF BLAST MAX | Fresh Foam |
| Upper Material | Woven Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | Durable Rubber |
| Sales Rank | 13452 | 3173 |
| Color Options | Twilight Blue/White | Black/Castlerock/Rose |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 vs. New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 is priced at $139.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is significantly cheaper at $59.99, making it about 57% less expensive. This price difference reflects the varying target audiences and features each shoe offers. The ASICS model boasts advanced technology aimed at serious runners, while the New Balance option focuses on comfort and versatility for casual wearers.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a woven mesh upper in twilight blue and white, providing a stylish yet functional look. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 comes in a black, castlerock, and metallic rose color scheme. The choice of colors can influence a runner's decision based on personal style preferences, but both shoes aim to attract those who appreciate modern, sleek designs.
Comfort and Fit
In terms of comfort, the ASICS GT-2000 14 is designed with a trampoline-inspired outsole pod and 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which enhances stability and energy return during runs. The New Balance 520 V9, on the other hand, features fresh foam cushioning that delivers responsive comfort. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS model may appeal more to dedicated runners seeking performance, whereas the New Balance shoe's lightweight design (just over 200 grams) is perfect for those who favor casual wear.
Performance Features
The ASICS GT-2000 14 includes innovative technology like rearfoot PureGEL, which is 65% softer than standard GEL technology. This makes it a strong contender for those looking for a high-performance running shoe that offers excellent shock absorption and support. The New Balance 520 V9, while lightweight and breathable, may not have the same level of advanced performance features but still provides reliable cushioning for moderate training and daily activities.
Durability and Traction
Durability is a critical factor for any running shoe. The ASICS GT-2000 14 features a synthetic rubber outsole designed for long-lasting performance, particularly on varied terrains. The New Balance 520 V9 also includes a durable rubber outsole that offers reliable traction. While both shoes are built to withstand wear, the ASICS model is likely to perform better in more demanding conditions, given its focus on serious runners.
Breathability
Breathability is essential for maintaining comfort during runs. The ASICS GT-2000 14 incorporates a woven mesh upper to help keep feet dry, which is crucial for longer runs or warmer weather. Similarly, the New Balance 520 V9's breathable mesh design ensures that feet stay cool and dry during workouts. Both options excel in breathability, but the ASICS shoe's additional features may provide an edge for those prioritizing performance.
Price Comparison
With a price tag of $139.95, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 is more than double the price of the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9, which is available for $59.99. This represents a price difference of about $79.96. For budget-conscious consumers or those who engage in casual running, the New Balance shoe offers significant savings while still delivering a decent running experience.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 ultimately depends on your running needs and budget. If you are a serious runner seeking advanced features and performance, the ASICS model is worth the investment. However, if you prioritize comfort for casual wear or light running while saving money, the New Balance option is a strong contender at a much lower price point.

