ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, leads on stability and fit.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers superior stability and energy return, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is a budget-friendly option focused on comfort.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better
Stability
ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for enhanced stability.
Energy Return
ASICS has a trampoline-inspired outsole for better energy return.
Cushioning
ASICS uses rearfoot PureGEL technology for superior cushioning.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is approximately 48% cheaper.
Weight
New Balance offers a lightweight design for casual runs.
Breathability
New Balance features a breathable premium molded mesh upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Upper Material | Woven Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Midsole | FF BLAST MAX | Fresh Foam |
| Outsole | Rubber | Integrated Rubber |
| Fit | Snug | Comfortable |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes are designed for stability and energy return, making them a solid choice for serious runners. Priced at $139.95, these shoes feature a trampoline-inspired outsole that enhances energy return during toe-off. With a sales rank of 13,452, they are a popular option among running enthusiasts. The shoes come equipped with a woven mesh upper, which promotes breathability, and a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that provides on-demand stability. Overall, the GT-2000 14 shoes aim to deliver both comfort and performance for long-distance runners.
Overview of New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is priced at $72.24, making it about 48% cheaper than the ASICS option. This model emphasizes ultra-cushioned comfort with its Fresh Foam midsole, which is engineered for lightweight rides. With a sales rank slightly higher at 13,435, the Fresh Foam 680 v9 is recognized for its breathable premium molded mesh upper and integrated rubber outsole that supports underfoot comfort. This shoe is designed to provide a comfortable experience for both casual and serious runners alike.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, both shoes offer unique features tailored to enhance the running experience. The ASICS GT-2000 14 includes a rearfoot PureGEL technology that is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, promising a plush feel during runs. Its asymmetric tongue wing adds to the snug fit, reducing tongue movement for a secure feel around the midfoot.
On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 prioritizes cushioning with its precision-engineered Fresh Foam midsole, offering a lightweight and cushioned ride. The shoe also boasts a textile upper, which enhances breathability. While both shoes are designed for comfort, the ASICS model focuses more on stability, while New Balance leans towards plush cushioning.
Performance and Stability
In terms of performance, the ASICS GT-2000 14 is built for stability, featuring a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts to the runner's needs. This technology is particularly advantageous for those who require extra support during their runs. The trampoline-inspired outsole not only aids in energy return but also ensures a balanced toe-off, making these shoes suitable for long distances.
Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 focuses on providing a smooth ride with its integrated rubber outsole and lightweight design. While it may not offer the same level of stability as the ASICS model, it excels in providing a comfortable experience for casual runs and everyday wear. This distinction makes the ASICS better suited for serious runners, while the New Balance option may appeal to those who prioritize comfort over technical features.
Breathability and Materials
Both shoes emphasize breathability, but they utilize different materials to achieve this. The ASICS GT-2000 14 features a woven mesh upper that enhances airflow, helping to keep feet dry during extended runs. This is complemented by a polyester lining that adds to the overall comfort.
In comparison, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 offers a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper, which also contributes to comfort and ventilation. While both models excel in breathability, the ASICS design may be more effective for serious runners who sweat more during long distances, providing a slight edge in moisture management.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetically, both running shoes have their unique charm. The ASICS GT-2000 14 comes in a striking Twilight Blue/White color scheme, appealing to those who appreciate a bold yet classic look. The design is functional while still being visually appealing for fashion-conscious runners.
On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 maintains a more understated appearance but remains stylish with its clean lines and colors. While aesthetics may not be the primary concern for every runner, the look of footwear can influence purchasing decisions, and both options cater to different tastes.
Price Comparison
Price is a significant factor when considering these two running shoe options. The ASICS GT-2000 14 is priced at $139.95, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is available for $72.24. This price difference makes the New Balance shoe about 48% cheaper than its ASICS counterpart. For budget-conscious consumers or those who are new to running, the Fresh Foam 680 v9 presents a more accessible option without sacrificing comfort. However, serious runners may find the investment in the ASICS GT-2000 14 justifiable given its advanced stability features.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you prioritize stability, energy return, and are willing to invest in a higher-priced shoe, the ASICS option is an excellent choice. On the other hand, if you are looking for a budget-friendly shoe that offers comfort and is suitable for casual running, the New Balance model is a fantastic alternative. Both shoes cater to different types of runners, making them worthy contenders in the running shoe market.

