ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, leads on support and fit.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 offers superior stability and energy return, making it ideal for responsive running, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 excels in plush cushioning.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $10 cheaper
Stability
ASICS features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM
Energy Return
ASICS has a trampoline-inspired outsole
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe is better
Cushioning
New Balance offers a Fresh Foam X midsole
Sales Rank
New Balance has a better sales rank
Upper Support
New Balance has a structured upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes, 9.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Upper Material | Woven Mesh | Structured Upper |
| Midsole | FF BLAST MAX | Fresh Foam X |
| Outsole | Trampoline Pod | Cushioned |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 Running Shoes are priced at $139.95 and are designed to provide energetic support during runs. With a sales rank of 13,452, these shoes have garnered attention for their innovative features. The woven mesh upper allows for breathability, helping to keep feet dry during intense workouts. The trampoline-inspired outsole pod enhances energy return, providing a bouncy feel during toe-off, while the 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM offers adaptive stability for a secure fit. This shoe is well-suited for those seeking both comfort and performance in their running experience.
Overview of the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 Running Shoe is slightly more expensive at $149.95, making it about 7.5% pricier than the ASICS model. This shoe boasts a stellar sales rank of 6,878, indicating its popularity among consumers. It features a structured yet breathable upper that offers additional support, catering to runners who prioritize stability. The Fresh Foam X midsole foam, which contains approximately 3% bio-based content, aims to deliver exceptional comfort, making it a strong contender for those who want cushioning during their runs.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 emphasizes a balanced toe-off with its trampoline-inspired forefoot pod. This design not only offers stability but also enhances energy return, making your runs feel more dynamic. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 focuses on cushioning with its Fresh Foam X midsole, which aims to provide an incredibly soft landing. While both shoes offer comfort, the ASICS model leans more towards a responsive ride, whereas the New Balance prioritizes plush cushioning, catering to different preferences among runners.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is a key feature of the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14, thanks to its woven mesh upper that effectively helps keep feet dry during workouts. The asymmetric tongue wing enhances the fit, ensuring that the shoe feels secure around the midfoot. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 also incorporates a structured upper that is breathable, promoting airflow. However, it does not specifically mention any unique fitting technologies. Runners who value a snug fit might lean towards the ASICS, while those seeking a more straightforward, supportive design may prefer the New Balance.
Stability and Support
Stability and support are critical for any runner, especially during long distances. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that adapts to the runner's movement, providing a tailored level of stability throughout their stride. This makes it an excellent option for overpronators or those needing extra support. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 offers a structured upper designed for support but lacks the adaptive technology found in the ASICS model. For runners who require enhanced stability, the ASICS option stands out as the superior choice.
Performance on Different Terrains
Both the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15 are designed for running, but their specific features may influence performance on various terrains. The ASICS model's trampoline-inspired outsole pod is particularly advantageous for road running, offering energy return and a smooth ride. Meanwhile, the New Balance shoe's cushioned midsole provides comfort on hard surfaces, making it a solid choice for urban environments. Depending on the runner's preferred terrain, either shoe could excel, but the ASICS model might have a slight edge for those seeking versatility.
Style and Aesthetic Appeal
In terms of style, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 comes in a striking Twilight Blue/White colorway, which may appeal to those looking for a vibrant running shoe. The design balances functionality with a modern look. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15, while more understated, offers a classic aesthetic that many runners appreciate. Both shoes have their own unique visual appeal, catering to different tastes among runners. Ultimately, the choice of style may come down to personal preference.
Which should you buy?
When deciding between the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 880 V15, it is essential to consider your specific running needs. The ASICS model, priced at $139.95, offers excellent stability and energy return, making it ideal for runners seeking a responsive experience. On the other hand, the New Balance shoe, at $149.95, provides plush cushioning and support, which may be preferable for those who prioritize comfort over responsiveness. Ultimately, both shoes have their strengths, but the ASICS Women's GT-2000 14 may be the better choice for those needing enhanced stability and a more energetic ride.

