ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, vs New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, leads on comfort and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 excels in performance and comfort, while the New Balance Women's 574 Core offers great value for casual wear.
Why ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, is better
Performance
ASICS features advanced GUIDESOLE technology for better energy savings.
Cushioning
FF BLAST PLUS cushioning provides superior comfort for long runs.
Breathability
Fully mesh upper enhances airflow during intense workouts.
Why New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker is better
Price
New Balance is approximately 44% cheaper.
Sustainability
Includes 5% recycled rubber and bio-based content.
Versatility
Classic design suitable for casual wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, | New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Model | Noosa TRI 16 | 574 Core |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST PLUS | ENCAP |
| Upper | Mesh | Suede/Mesh |
| Outsole | ASICSGRIP | Recycled Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Overview
In the realm of running shoes, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 and the New Balance Women's 574 Core Sneaker stand out for their distinct features and price points. The ASICS Noosa TRI 16 is priced at $134.95, while the New Balance 574 Core comes in at a significantly lower price of $74.95, making it about 44% cheaper. This price difference sets the stage for a deeper exploration of what each shoe offers to potential buyers.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 presents a vibrant look with its bold colors and patterns, making it a stylish choice for runners who enjoy standing out. The mesh upper not only enhances breathability but also adds to its dynamic aesthetic. In contrast, the New Balance Women's 574 Core features a more classic design, incorporating a combination of suede and mesh. While the New Balance shoe offers a timeless appeal that can easily transition from running to casual wear, the ASICS shoe aims for a sporty vibe that is particularly appealing for dedicated athletes.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Noosa TRI 16 excels with its FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, designed to provide lightweight and soft impact absorption underfoot. This makes it an excellent choice for those who prioritize comfort during long runs. On the other hand, the New Balance 574 Core uses ENCAP midsole cushioning, which combines soft foam with a durable polyurethane rim. This construction offers all-day support, but it may not match the specific running-focused design of the ASICS model. Both shoes feature adjustable lace closures, ensuring a customized fit, but the ASICS shoe’s advanced cushioning technology may give it the edge for serious runners.
Performance Features
The ASICS Noosa TRI 16 is equipped with GUIDESOLE technology, which promotes smoother toe-offs and enhances energy savings during runs. Additionally, its ASICSGRIP outsole rubber provides excellent grip on various terrains, making it versatile for different running conditions. Conversely, the New Balance 574 Core includes an EVA midsole foam that contains about 3% bio-based content, contributing to its eco-friendliness. While it offers decent support for casual wear and light activities, it lacks the specialized features that cater to high-performance running found in the ASICS model.
Breathability
Breathability is crucial for running shoes, and the ASICS Noosa TRI 16 shines in this area. The mesh upper effectively promotes airflow, keeping feet cool during intense workouts. This is particularly important for longer runs where comfort can be compromised by overheating. The New Balance 574 Core also features a mesh upper, but the presence of suede may limit its breathability compared to the entirely mesh design of the ASICS shoe. Therefore, the Noosa TRI 16 is likely to provide a cooler experience in warmer conditions.
Sustainability
Sustainability is an important consideration for many consumers today. The New Balance 574 Core showcases its commitment to the environment with its use of 5% recycled rubber in the outsole and EVA midsole foam made from approximately 3% bio-based content. This eco-friendly approach appeals to environmentally conscious buyers. While the ASICS Noosa TRI 16 emphasizes advanced technology and performance, it does not highlight any specific sustainable materials, making the New Balance a more appealing choice for those prioritizing sustainability in their purchasing decisions.
Price Comparison
The pricing difference between the two models is quite notable, with the ASICS Noosa TRI 16 retailing at $134.95 while the New Balance 574 Core is priced at $74.95. This makes the New Balance shoe approximately 44% less expensive, which could be a significant factor for budget-conscious consumers. While both shoes offer distinct advantages, those looking for a high-performance running shoe may be willing to invest more in the ASICS model. However, for casual wear and everyday comfort, the New Balance offers excellent value without compromising too much on quality.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 and the New Balance Women's 574 Core ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you are a serious runner looking for advanced technology, superior cushioning, and enhanced performance features, the ASICS Noosa TRI 16 is worth the investment at $134.95. However, if you are seeking a versatile, stylish sneaker for casual wear that provides comfort at a more budget-friendly price of $74.95, the New Balance 574 Core is a solid choice. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider your primary use case when making your decision.

