ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl wins on comfort and cushioning, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running wins on weight.
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 offers advanced cushioning and stability, while the New Balance 520 V9 excels in affordability and lightweight design.
Why ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl is better
Cushioning
FF BLAST MAX cushioning provides superior energy return.
Fit
Tongue wing construction enhances stability.
Traction
AHAR® LO outsole rubber improves traction on various terrains.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $59.99.
Weight
Lightweight design at just over 200 grams.
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank at 3,173.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Current Price | $149.95 | $59.99 |
| Sales Rank | 7224 | 3173 |
| Cushion Type | FF BLAST MAX | Fresh Foam |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes are priced at $149.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $59.99. This means the ASICS shoes are about 150% more expensive than the New Balance option. For budget-conscious shoppers, the New Balance model offers substantial savings without sacrificing quality. The price difference presents a clear factor for those who are mindful of their spending on running shoes.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 incorporates FF BLAST MAX cushioning, which is designed to provide a lightweight and energetic ride. This cushioning feature aims to deliver softer landings and enhanced toe-off, making it suitable for various running scenarios. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 520 V9 features a fresh foam cushioning midsole that offers responsive comfort mile after mile. Both models prioritize comfort, but the specific technologies highlight different approaches to cushioning, with ASICS focusing on energy return and New Balance emphasizing responsive comfort.
Fit and Design
The fit and design of each shoe cater to different preferences. ASICS employs a tongue wing construction that enhances fit while reducing tongue movement, promoting stability during runs. In contrast, the New Balance model features a simple lace-up closure that allows for easy adjustments to fit comfortably and securely on the foot. While both designs aim for a snug fit, ASICS may appeal more to those who prioritize stability, whereas New Balance offers convenience and a classic design.
Breathability
Breathability is a key factor for runners, especially during intense workouts. The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 has a breathable engineered jacquard mesh upper, which helps keep feet cool and dry. Similarly, the New Balance 520 V9 includes breathable mesh that supports airflow during cardio activities. Both shoes excel in this area, but ASICS' focus on engineered materials may provide a slight edge in terms of advanced ventilation technology compared to the standard mesh used in New Balance.
Weight
When it comes to weight, the New Balance Fresh Foam 520 V9 is notably lightweight, coming in at just over 200 grams. This lower weight can facilitate quicker movements and less fatigue during long runs. The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 does not specify an exact weight, but its advanced cushioning technologies might contribute to a heavier design. For runners who prioritize speed and agility, the weight advantage of the New Balance shoe could be a significant factor to consider.
Traction and Durability
Both running shoes offer reliable traction, but they utilize different materials to achieve it. The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 features an AHAR® LO outsole rubber which is designed for improved traction across various terrains. Meanwhile, the New Balance 520 V9 is equipped with a durable rubber outsole that also provides reliable traction on different running surfaces. The emphasis on durability in both models indicates that they are built to withstand rigorous use, making either option a solid choice for longevity.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 holds a better sales rank at 3,173 compared to the ASICS NOVABLAST 5, which ranks at 7,224. This could suggest that the New Balance shoe is more favored among consumers, possibly due to its price point and comfort features. For buyers considering community feedback and popularity, the New Balance option may be more appealing based on its higher sales rank.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe ultimately hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for advanced cushioning and a snug fit, the ASICS model may be worth the investment. However, if affordability, lightweight design, and breathability are your priorities, the New Balance option stands out as a great value at $59.99. Evaluate your running habits and preferences to make the best choice for your next purchase.

