ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl wins on cushioning and fit, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on price.
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 offers superior cushioning and performance, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the New Balance 680 v9 is a great budget-friendly option for casual use.
Why ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl is better
Cushioning
FF BLAST MAX cushioning provides advanced comfort.
Fit
Tongue wing construction enhances fit and stability.
Traction
AHAR® LO outsole rubber offers superior grip.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Price
Significantly lower price at $72.24.
Weight
Lighter design for casual runners.
Brand appeal
Popular among casual users.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes, 8, Pearl | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Current Price | $149.95 | $72.24 |
| Sales Rank | 7224 | 13435 |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Textile |
| Cushion Type | FF BLAST MAX | Fresh Foam |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 and New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9
The ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe are two popular options for runners, each offering unique features to enhance your running experience. With a price difference of $77.71, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is priced at $149.95, while the New Balance 680 v9 retails for $72.24. This comparison will explore various aspects of both running shoes to help you make an informed decision.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 shines with its FF BLAST MAX cushioning, designed to provide a lightweight and energetic ride. This technology helps create softer landings and a more responsive toe-off, making it ideal for long runs. In contrast, the New Balance 680 v9 features Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, engineered to deliver an ultra-cushioned and lightweight experience. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS offers a more advanced cushioning system, which may appeal to serious runners looking for performance enhancements.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is characterized by its breathable engineered jacquard mesh upper and trampoline-inspired outsole, aimed at providing a more responsive bounce back. The reflective details also enhance visibility during low-light conditions. The New Balance 680 v9 features a textile upper with breathable molded engineered mesh, promoting airflow and comfort. While both shoes have appealing aesthetics, the ASICS may provide a slight edge with its innovative design elements intended for performance.
Fit and Support
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 incorporates tongue wing construction, which helps improve fit while reducing tongue movement. This design detail contributes to a snug and secure fit, essential for runners who value stability. On the other hand, the New Balance 680 v9 features a lace closure system that allows for adjustable fit, but it may not provide the same level of support as the ASICS. For runners prioritizing fit and support, the NOVABLAST 5 may be the preferable choice with its advanced construction.
Traction and Durability
In terms of traction, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 utilizes AHAR® LO outsole rubber, which enhances durability and grip across various terrains. This feature is vital for runners who frequently encounter different surfaces. The New Balance 680 v9 also boasts an integrated rubber outsole that supports underfoot comfort but may not match the same level of durability as the ASICS. For those focused on long-term use and traction, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5's superior outsole technology makes it a compelling option.
Versatility and Performance
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is designed with versatility in mind, suitable for various running styles and distances, thanks to its trampoline-inspired outsole and advanced cushioning system. It ranks 7,224 in sales, indicating a solid standing among running enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the New Balance 680 v9, with its focus on comfort, is an excellent option for more casual runners or those new to the sport. However, it ranks lower at 13,435, suggesting it may not appeal to as many serious runners. If performance is your priority, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is likely the better choice.
Price and Value
The ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is priced at $149.95, while the New Balance 680 v9 is significantly lower at $72.24, making it about 48% cheaper. This price difference may be a crucial factor for budget-conscious consumers. While the ASICS offers advanced features that may justify its higher price, the New Balance provides excellent value for those seeking comfort without breaking the bank. The decision here will largely depend on how much you’re willing to invest in running shoes.
Brand Reputation and Popularity
Both ASICS and New Balance are well-respected brands in the running shoe market. ASICS has a reputation for producing high-performance footwear, while New Balance is known for its comfort and casual wear. The sales rank of ASICS at 7,224 reflects its popularity among serious runners, while New Balance's rank at 13,435 indicates a broader appeal to casual users. If brand reputation and popularity influence your decision, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 may be the more compelling option.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, fit, and performance for serious running, the ASICS NOVABLAST 5 is worth the investment at $149.95. However, if you're looking for a comfortable, budget-friendly option for casual runs or everyday wear, the New Balance 680 v9 at $72.24 offers excellent value. Consider your running habits, budget, and preference for brand reputation when making your choice.

