Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide leads on fit and comfort.
The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 offers superior comfort and style, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better
Comfort
Brooks features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning.
Fit
Brooks offers a wide fit accommodating orthotics.
Performance
Brooks has a higher sales rank indicating popularity among serious runners.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper at $72.24.
Weight
New Balance is designed for a lightweight feel.
Breathability
New Balance features a breathable engineered mesh upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Cushion Type | DNA LOFT V3 | Fresh Foam |
| Upper Material | Nylon | Textile |
| Outsole | Rubber | Rubber |
| Sales Rank | 2293 | 13435 |
| Fit Type | Wide | Standard |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9
The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 retails for $159.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is significantly cheaper at $72.24, making it about 55% less expensive. This price difference highlights a fundamental choice between premium features and budget-friendly options in running shoes.
The Brooks Ghost Max 3 is designed for those seeking enhanced comfort and style, featuring a high stack nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 for cushioning and a unique construction that accommodates orthotics. In contrast, the New Balance 680 v9 emphasizes lightweight comfort with its Fresh Foam midsole, making it an excellent choice for casual runners.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort and cushioning, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 technology, designed to provide a plush feel underfoot. The high stack height and inclusive fit make it particularly suitable for those who require additional volume in their shoes.
On the other hand, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 offers a different approach to cushioning. Its precision-engineered Fresh Foam midsole is crafted to deliver an ultra-cushioned ride, ensuring every step feels effortless. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Ghost Max 3 leans more towards a plush experience, whereas the Fresh Foam 680 v9 focuses on a lightweight feel.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 showcases a sleek sporty style that combines functionality with aesthetics. The black and rose gold colorway offers a stylish look that appeals to many runners. Its low-top design and lace-up closure provide a modern appeal while ensuring a secure fit.
Conversely, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper, designed for ventilation during runs. Its textile upper and lace closure contribute to a streamlined appearance, although it may not match the aesthetic flair of the Ghost Max 3.
Fit and Sizing
The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is available in a wide fit, catering to runners who require additional space or have orthotic needs. This unique construction not only enhances comfort but also accommodates a variety of foot shapes.
In contrast, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 offers a standard fit. While it provides comfort, runners with wider feet might find it less accommodating. The choice between these two shoes will depend on individual foot shape and personal preference for fit.
Performance and Durability
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is ranked 2293 in sales, indicating its popularity among serious runners seeking a performance-oriented shoe. Its combination of high-quality materials and advanced cushioning makes it suitable for longer runs or those who log significant miles.
The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9, with a sales rank of 13435, is also a solid choice but is more geared towards casual runners or those new to the sport. Its integrated rubber outsole supports underfoot comfort but may not offer the same level of durability as the Brooks model, especially for frequent long-distance runners.
Price and Value
The price difference between the two models is substantial, with the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 priced at $159.95, while the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 is available for just $72.24. This represents a remarkable savings of about $87.71.
While the Brooks model offers premium features and a high-end feel, the New Balance shoe provides excellent value for runners on a budget. The decision will ultimately hinge on whether the buyer prioritizes advanced features and materials or seeks a more economical option without compromising too much on quality.
Brand Reputation
Brooks and New Balance are both well-respected brands in the running community, known for their commitment to quality and performance. Brooks has carved out a niche for itself as a brand that focuses on serious runners, often emphasizing performance and comfort features in its designs.
New Balance, on the other hand, is celebrated for its diverse range of footwear that caters to both serious athletes and casual users. Each brand has its loyal following, and the choice may come down to personal preference and brand loyalty.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 ultimately comes down to your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, a stylish design, and a fit that accommodates orthotics, the Brooks model is the clear choice despite its higher price tag. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly shoe that offers good comfort and lightweight performance for casual runs, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is a fantastic alternative.

