vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on support and comfort, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running wins on weight and breathability.

The Brooks shoe offers advanced features and superior support, while the New Balance is a budget-friendly option. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better

Waterproof

Brooks features GORE-TEX waterproof technology.

Support

Brooks has a Guiderails Holistic Support System.

Cushioning

Brooks uses advanced DNA LOFT v2 cushioning.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better

Price

New Balance is significantly cheaper.

Weight

New Balance is lighter at just over 200 grams.

Traction

New Balance has a durable rubber outsole.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
75

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX WaterproofNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
BrandBrooksNew Balance
ModelAdrenaline GTS 23Fresh Foam 520 V9
CushioningDNA LOFT v2Fresh Foam
WaterproofYesNo
SupportGuiderailsNone

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX WaterproofNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is priced at $165.00, making it significantly more expensive than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9, which retails for $59.99. This means the Brooks shoe is about 175% higher in price compared to the New Balance shoe. For budget-conscious buyers, the New Balance option is the clear winner in this category. While the Brooks shoe is positioned as a premium product with additional features, the stark contrast in price may influence your purchasing decision, especially if you are looking for a reliable running shoe without breaking the bank.

Comfort and Cushioning

The Brooks shoe features a new midsole with soft and lighter weight DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, designed to provide a smooth and comfortable ride. On the other hand, the New Balance shoe is equipped with Fresh Foam cushioning that promises responsive comfort mile after mile. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks may offer a more plush experience due to its advanced cushioning technology. However, the New Balance’s lightweight design, at just over 200 grams, makes it a strong contender for those prioritizing speed and agility during their runs.

Waterproof Protection

One of the standout features of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is its GORE-TEX Invisible Fit technology, which provides breathable waterproof protection. This makes it an ideal choice for runners who train in various weather conditions. The New Balance shoe, while offering great comfort and breathability, does not have waterproof capabilities. If you frequently run in wet environments, the Brooks shoe’s waterproof feature could be a decisive factor in your selection.

Fit and Support

The Brooks shoe is designed with a Guiderails Holistic Support System, which aligns your body in its natural motion path while controlling excess movement. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners requiring additional support. In contrast, the New Balance shoe offers a simple lace-up closure that adjusts for a comfortable fit but lacks the specialized support technology found in the Brooks. If you have specific support needs, the Brooks option may be more suitable for you, while the New Balance is better for those seeking a straightforward fit.

Breathability

Breathability is crucial in running shoes, particularly for those who engage in intensive workouts. The New Balance shoe features breathable mesh that helps keep your feet cool and dry during cardio sessions. While the Brooks also incorporates an engineered Air Mesh upper for enhanced breathability, its waterproof design may slightly compromise airflow. For runners prioritizing ventilation, the New Balance’s breathable mesh design could provide a cooler experience during warmer runs.

Traction and Durability

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 boasts a durable rubber outsole that ensures reliable traction on various running surfaces. This is particularly advantageous for runners who may navigate different terrains. The Brooks shoe, while also designed for road running and cross-training, does not explicitly highlight its traction capabilities in the provided features. If traction is a key factor in your running routine, the New Balance might be the better option, especially given its dedicated emphasis on durability.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of aesthetics, both shoes offer appealing designs. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features a sleek look with a color combination of black, knockout pink, and aqua, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 showcases a more understated black, castlerock, and metallic rose palette. Style preference varies from person to person, but if vibrant colors and a sporty design are important to you, the Brooks shoe may be more attractive, whereas the New Balance might appeal to those who prefer a simple, classic look.

Which should you buy?

In summary, your choice between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 depends heavily on your specific needs and budget. The Brooks shoe offers advanced features like waterproof protection, dynamic cushioning, and specialized support, but comes at a significantly higher price of $165.00. Meanwhile, the New Balance shoe is a more budget-friendly option at $59.99, providing comfort, breathability, and durability for everyday runs. If you require superior support and weather resistance, the Brooks is the top choice. However, for those looking for a reliable, cost-effective running shoe, the New Balance is an excellent alternative.