Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on waterproof and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on price and weight.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers superior support and waterproof features, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is more budget-friendly and comfortable for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Support
Brooks has advanced support features.
Waterproof
Brooks offers waterproof technology.
Cushioning
Brooks uses DNA LOFT v2 cushioning.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Weight
New Balance is lighter.
Design
New Balance has a classic look.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX | Fresh Foam 680 v9 |
| Price | $165.00 | $72.24 |
| Cushioning | DNA LOFT v2 | Fresh Foam |
| Waterproof | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right running shoe, two strong contenders are the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9. The Brooks shoe is priced at $165.00, while the New Balance option is significantly cheaper at $72.24, making it about 56% less expensive. This price difference may influence your decision depending on your budget and running needs.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX boasts a sleek and modern design with a color combination of Black, Knockout Pink, and Aqua. This shoe not only looks stylish but also integrates GORE-TEX technology for waterproof capabilities, making it ideal for various weather conditions. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a more understated design with a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper. While the New Balance shoe aims for a simple and classic look, the Brooks shoe stands out with its bold color choices and technical features that enhance its appeal for serious runners.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is paramount in any running shoe, and each of these models offers a unique approach. The Brooks shoe includes a new midsole with DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, providing a smooth and soft ride, ideal for runners seeking support during long distances. On the other hand, the New Balance shoe features Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, designed for an ultra-cushioned yet lightweight experience. Though both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model's advanced cushioning system may better suit those with specific support needs.
Performance on Different Terrains
Performance can vary significantly depending on the terrain. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts, thanks to its waterproof protection and stability features. The GORE-TEX layer ensures that your feet stay dry, which is a significant advantage in wet conditions. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is also suitable for various surfaces but lacks the waterproof capabilities of the Brooks shoe. If you frequently run in unpredictable weather, the Brooks shoe may offer the reliability you need.
Fit and Support
Fit is crucial for any running shoe, and both options cater to different preferences. The Brooks shoe utilizes a Guiderails Holistic Support System that aligns your body in its natural motion path, providing excellent support and reducing excess movement. This feature can be particularly beneficial for runners who overpronate. Conversely, the New Balance shoe employs a lace closure system and a textile upper for a comfortable fit, though it does not offer the same level of structured support as the Brooks model. Runners needing additional stability may prefer the Brooks option.
Price and Value
Price is a significant factor for many shoppers. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is priced at $165.00, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is available for $72.24. This makes the Brooks shoe about 56% more expensive than the New Balance option. While the Brooks shoe offers premium features such as waterproofing and a robust support system, the New Balance model provides excellent value for those on a budget or casual runners who prioritize comfort over specialized features.
Brand Reputation
Both Brooks and New Balance have established themselves as reputable brands in the running community. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX has a sales rank of 22,780, indicating a strong presence in the market, particularly among runners looking for support and comfort. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 has a better sales rank of 13,435, reflecting its popularity and appeal to a broader audience. Brand loyalty can play a crucial role in your decision, as both brands have loyal followings based on their unique offerings.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you require a shoe with advanced support features, waterproof technology, and are willing to invest more, the Brooks shoe is a superior choice. However, if budget is a primary concern and you seek comfort for everyday running, the New Balance option is an excellent value. Consider how often you run in varying weather conditions and the level of support you need to make the best decision for your running journey.

